2026:JHHC:4968 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.11428 of 2025 Harendra Oraon @ Hare Oraon aged about 30 years. Son of – Bolwa Oraon. Residence of Village- Satonawatoli, P.O.- Sato, P.S.- Bishunpur, District- Gumla. … Petitioner. Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party. Coram:HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajesh Singh, Adv. For the State : Mr. Pankaj Kumar, P.P. Order No.03/Dated- 19.02.2026 Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Bishunpur P.S. Case No. 03 of 2025 registered for offences punishable under Sections 190, 191(2), 191(3), 109, 111, 132 of the B.N.S., 2023 and under Sections 25(1-A), 26, 27 and 35 of the Arms Act which is pending in the Court of Learned Judicial Magistrate, Gumla. 3. On the basis of self-statement of S.I. Rakesh Kumar Singh it is alleged that there had some exchange of firing took place between the police personnel and the extremists. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case without attributing any specific role against him. It is simply stated that 06 accused persons were firing on the police personnel with their respective arms. Except the name of the petitioner in the F.I.R. there is no specific role attributed against him and no incriminating articles have been recovered during investigating from the possession of the petitioner. No police personnel were injured in the firing by the accused persons. Charge-sheet has also been submitted in this case against the petitioner and he is in custody since 18.08.2025. Petitioner undertakes to co-operate in the trial of the case by remaining physically present as and when required and shall not indulge in any 2026:JHHC:4968 manner in tampering with the prosecution evidences or influencing the witnesses of prosecution, hence, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor has strongly opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and has submitted that there is serious allegation of firing upon the police personnel and petitioner is named accused in the first information report, therefore, he doesn't deserve to be enlarged on bail. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and materials available against the petitioner and there is no specific role attributed against the petitioner, I am inclined to admit the above- named petitioner, on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner named above, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees twenty-thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Learned Judicial Magistrate, Gumla in connection with Bishunpur P.S. Case No. 03 of 2025. (Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.) Dated-19.02.2026 Amar/- Uploaded on:- 20.02.2026.