Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5449 (GAU)

MRS PARINITA BORA v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

I.A.(Civil)/1389/2026 · 2026-05-05

Nelson Sailo

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010134702019 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1389/2026 MRS PARINITA BORA W/O SRI MUKTA SAIKIA VILLAGE BATAMARI P.O. GHURAMARA DISTRICTLAKHIMPUR ASSAM PIN 787032 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM DISPUR GUWAHATI-781006. 2:THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM EDUCATION HIGHER DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-781006. 3:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY EDUCATION (HIGHER) DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM DISPUR GUWAHATI781006. 4:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY FINANCE DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM DISPUR GUWAHATI-781006. Page No.# 2/3 5:THE DIRECTOR OF HIGHER EDUCATION KAHILIPARA GUWAHATI-19 ASSAM. 6:HARHI COLLEGE LAKHIMPUR REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL. 7:SMTI PRATIMA CHETIA D/O PHANI CHETIA A RESIDENT OF CHETIA GAON HARHI SAPATIA IN THE DISTRICT OF LAKHIMPUR ASSAM-787058 ASSAM. ------------ Advocate for : MR A C BORBORA Advocate for : GA ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NELSON SAILO ORDER Date : 06.05.2026 Heard Mr. M. Smith, learned counsel for the applicant, who submits that this application is filed for impleadment of Smt. Pratima Chetia as respondent No.7 in view of the order passed by the Division Bench in the Writ Appeal filed by Smt. Pratima Chetia. Mr. J. I. Borbhuiya, learned counsel submits that he has instructions to appear on behalf of the respondent No.7 to be impleaded and he has also filed his power. Ms. D. D. Barman, learned Addl. Senior Govt. Advocate for the respondent No.1; Mr. A. R. Tahbildar, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 2, 3 and 5; Ms. R. M. Baruah, learned Standing Counsel, Finance Department for the Page No.# 3/3 respondent No.4 and Mr. H. P. Neog, learned counsel for the respondent No.6 have no objections to the prayer made in the application. Accordingly, impleadment of Smt. Pratima Chetia as respondent No.7 in the main writ petition is allowed as prayed for. I.A. is accordingly stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant