Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5449 (ALL)

SAJID HUSSAIN v. SMT. PATASIYA DEVI AND ANOTHER

A227/12205/2026 · 2026-09-07

Rohit Ranjan Agarwal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 12205 of 2026 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. The suit filed by the plaintiff was dismissed for want of prosecution and the defendants had appeared on the date fixed. An application under Order IX Rule 9 CPC was moved which has been registered as Misc. Case No.73 of 2011. The sole prayer made in the writ petition is for expeditious disposal of the said case. 2. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to private respondents, with a direction upon Civil Judge (Junior Division), Kasya, Kushinagar to decide Misc. Case No.73 of 2011, in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. 3. With the aforesaid direction, present writ petition stands disposed of. 4. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the case on merit. September 8, 2026 SK Goswami Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajiv Ratan, Surya Kant Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Sajid Hussain .....Petitioner(s) Smt. Patasiya Devi And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHIVAKANT GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad