Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5446 (RAJ)

MAHENDRA KUMAR GAUR v. STATE OF RAJ AND ORS

CW/12919/2008 · 2026-02-18

Inderjeet Singh, Ravi Chirania

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:7674-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12919/2008 Mahendra Kumar Gaur S/o. Shri Amar Singh, aged 46 years, Resident of Bamori Khurd, Tehsil Mangrol, Distt. Baran (Raj.) presently working as Sahayak Vyavasthapak in Bamori Khurd Gram Seva Sehkari Samiti Ltd. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through Secretary Cooperative, Rajasthan Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Nehru Sehkar Bhawan, 22 Godown, Jaipur. 3. The Rajasthan State Cooperative Bank Ltd. through its Man- aging Director, DC-1, Opposite Nehru Bal Udhyan, Tonk Road, Jaipur. 4. The Baran Central Cooperative Bank through its Managing Di- rector, Near, Nagar Palika Bhawan, Station Road, Baran (Raj.). 5. Executive Officer, the Baran Central Cooperative, Bank, Near, Nagar Palika Bhawan, Station Road, Baran (Raj.) 6. Chairman, Bamori, Gram Seva Sehkari, Tehsil Mangrol, Distt. Baran. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shailesh Prakash Sharma For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA Order 18/02/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with the ef- flux of time during pendency of the writ petition no cause of action survives for pursuing the writ petition and the writ petition has be- come infructuous. [2026:RJ-JP:7674-DB] (2 of 2) [CW-12919/2008] 2. Accordingly the writ petition is dismissed as rendered infruc- tuous. 3. It is made clear that an endeavor should be made for revival of the writ petition in case cause of action still survives. 4. All pending application(s), if any stands dismissed. (RAVI CHIRANIA),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J Monika/Aman/29