Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5446 (PAT)

Birendra Yadav @ Birendra Singh Yadav v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./17074/2026 · 2026-03-17

Satyavrat Verma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17074 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-545 Year-2025 Thana- DINARA District- Rohtas ====================================================== Birendra Yadav @ Birendra Singh Yadav Son of Late Bihari Yadav @ Shyam Bihari Yadav Resident of Village - B.C. Kala, P.S.- Dinara, District - Rohtas. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Mithilesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Syed Mojibur Rahman ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 17-03-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has antecedent of one case under the Excise Act and allegation is of recovery of 09 litres of liquor from a bush near a pond. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was not arrested from the spot, as such, nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and even alleged recovery is from a place, which does not belong to the petitioner and is accessible to public at large and he came to be implicated Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17074 of 2026(2) dt.17-03-2026 2/3 based on confessional statement of Rita in police custody, which does not have any evidentiary value and petitioner has no concern or relation with Rita Devi. 5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the anticipatory bail application. 6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on provisional anticipatory bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Dinara P. S. Case No.545 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. 7. The application stands allowed. 8. It is made clear that the learned trial Court after accepting the provisional bail bonds of the petitioner shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the event, if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of more than one case, then it would be presumed that petitioner for the purposes of obtaining anticipatory bail had concealed his antecedent before Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17074 of 2026(2) dt.17-03-2026 3/3 this Court, in that event, the present provisional anticipatory bail order shall not be confirmed, but if on verification, it is found that petitioner has antecedent of one case only, in that event, the provisional anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith. vikash/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T