M/S.Shresta Constructions., v. Sri. S.Suresh Kumar,
CC/1510/2026 · 2026-07-09
Harinath N
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5446 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5446 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : 10.07.2026 Date of uploading : APHC010123522026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY, THE 10th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1510/2026 Between:
1. M/S.SHRESTA CONSTRUCTIONS.,, REP.BY.PROPRIETOR SRI.MADDIRALA SIREESHA, W/O M. SUMANTH, AGED 29 YEARS,D.NO.11-214, NEAR REM CHURCH,OLD MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. SRI S SURESH KUMAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBUN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR. - 522238
2. SRI ALEEM BASHA, COMMISSIONER MANGALAGIRI TADEPALLI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION,
MANGALIGIRI,GUNTUR DISTRICT.522503
3. SRI P SAMPATH KUMAR, COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION ,ANDHRA PRADESH AT PRIME HILL CREST ,VADDESWARAM,TADEPALLI GUNTUR DISTRICT. 522501
4. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR. - 522238.
...CONTEMNOR(S):
2
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondent herein for the willful, deliberate and wanton violation of the orders dt 16.07.2025 of this Hon'ble Court made in WP. No.23012/2024 Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. DEVASRI ROSHAN KANCHARLA Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA
2. A S C BOSE (SC FOR MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS AP)
3. The Court made the following:
3
Order:-
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.23012 of 2024, dated 16.07.2025 has been complied with and as such no further orders are necessary in this Contempt Case.
2. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N
10.07.2026 PNS
Whether the order is: Speaking ☑ Reasoned
Reportable
Non-reportable ☑