Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 54452 (MAD)

Suchetha v. The District Registrar

WP(MD)/19930/2026 · 2026-07-15

C Saravanan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.(MD) No.19930 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 15.07.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN W.P.(MD) No.19930 of 2026 Suchetha ... Petitioner /vs./ 1.The District Registrar O/o.District Registrar Tirunelveli District. 2.The Sub-Registrar O/o.Sub Registrar North Veeranallur Taluk Tirunelveli District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned refusal check slip issued by the 2nd respondent vide RFL/North Veeranallur/50/2026 dated 22.06.2026 and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to register the sale deed dated 22.06.2026 presented by the petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Sankar For Respondents : Ms.Sudarkodi Natchiyar counsel for the State of Tamil Nadu 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD) No.19930 of 2026 ORDER Ms.Sudarkodi Natchiyar, learned counsel for the State of Tamil Nadu, takes notice for the respondents. 2.This writ petition is disposed of at the time of admission after hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents. 3.The petitioner has challenged the impugned refusal check slip issued by the second respondent bearing Ref.No.RFL/North Veeranallur/50/2026 dated 22.06.2026. 4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that the impugned refusal check slip, declining to register the sale deed dated 22.06.2026 executed in favour of the petitioner, namely, Suchetha, by the power of attorney holder of the vendor, namely, Suchetha, the petitioner herein, is liable to be set aside and is accordingly set aside and the case is remitted back to the second respondent to pass a fresh order in accordance 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD) No.19930 of 2026 with law, as expeditiously as possible, after issuing notice to the aggrieved party, who has presented a protest letter dated 23.05.2026 with the second respondent. 5.It is for the person, who claims ownership, to produce necessary documents to substantiate that the power that was earlier granted to the petitioner was cancelled. In case, the person is unable to produce any document in respect of cancellation of power deed granted in favour of the petitioner, the respondents are directed to proceed with the case further in accordance with law. 6.The Writ Petition stands allowed, accordingly. No costs. Index : Yes / No 15.07.2026 Internet : Yes / No mm To 1.The District Registrar O/o.District Registrar Tirunelveli District. 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD) No.19930 of 2026 2.The Sub-Registrar O/o.Sub Registrar North Veeranallur Taluk Tirunelveli District. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD) No.19930 of 2026 C.SARAVANAN, J. mm W.P.(MD) No.19930 of 2026 15.07.2026 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis