Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5444 (CHH)

C.P. MISHRA v. ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER

WPS/847/2022 · 2026-01-19

Shri Sachin Singh Rajput

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:3458 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 847 of 2022 1 - C.P. Mishra S/o Late Shri S.D. Mishra Aged About 75 Years R/o Vikas Nagar Near Gurudwara Bilaspur District- Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Assistant General Manager R/o Behind Central Pension Prosessing Center Working Womans Residence Govindpura Bhopal Madhya Pradesh. 2 - Accountant General R/o Accounts And Entitlements, Balodabazar Road, Ziro Point Raipur, District- Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3 - Branch Manager R/o State Bank Of India, Branch Collectorate Branch Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 4 - Pay And Account Officer R/o Central Pension Accounting Officer, Trikoot -11 Bhikaji Kama Place R.K. Puram New Delhi. 5 - Senior Treasury Officer R/o Officer District Treasury Officer, Bilaspur District- Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : None For Respondent/State : Shri Abhyuday Tripathi, Panel Lawyer For Respondent No.2 : Shri Rajkumar Gupta, Advocate For Respondent No.3 : Shri P.R.Patankar, Advocate 2 ({Hon’ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput}) Order on Board 20/01/2026 This writ petition has been filed challenging order dated 18/11/2021 by which respondent No.3 directed the petitioner to make payment of 92,480/- otherwise deduction of Rs.11949/- to be made from the bank account of the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for the SBI submits that the said order was issued under the impression that the petitioner who has been paid the medical allowance of Rs.92,480/- was not entitled for the same. Now the revised PPO has been issued according to which the petitioner was held entitled for the said amount. Thus, no recovery would be made from pension of the petitioner. He also placed reliance on certain documents which is made part of the record. 3. In view of above, this petition is disposed off. However, liberty is reserved in favour of the petitioner to file a fresh petition, in case eventuality arises. Sd/- ({Sachin Singh Rajput}) JUDGE Deepti DEEPTI HARIKUMAR Digitally signed by DEEPTI HARIKUMAR Date: 2026.01.22 11:03:43 +0530