NIPU THAKUR ALIAS RAJBABU THAKUR AND ANR v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR
I.A.(Crl.)/456/2026 · 2026-05-05
Susmita Phukan Khaund
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5438 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5438 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010084942026
2026:GAU-AS:6165
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/456/2026 NIPU THAKUR ALIAS RAJBABU THAKUR AND ANR SON OF LATE HIRA THAKUR RESIDENT OF VILL- BALI GAON, P.O. AND P.S. DHAKUAKHANA,PIN- 787055, DIST. LAKHIMPUR, ASSAM.
2: SHRI PRAFULLA DAS SON OF SHRI DANDI DAS RESIDENT OF VILL- BHATI HUZ GAON P.O AND P.S. DHAKUAKHANA PIN- 787055 DIST. LAKHIMPUR ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REP BY THE PP, ASSAM 2:SMTI. MINA KALITA W/O PREM KALITA R/O VILL- DAKHINPAT KUMAR GAON
P.O. DAKHINPAT KUMAR GAON PIN-785102 P.S. BONGAIGAON PIN-785102 DIS. MAJULI ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. P BORDOLOI, MR D BHUYAN Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND
ORDER Date : 06-05-2026
Learned counsel Mr. R.K. Mahanta is present on behalf of learned counsel Mr. P. Bordoloi, representing the applicants 1. Shri Nipu thakur @ Rajbabu Thakur and 2. Shri Prafulla Das, who have filed this application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 with prayer for condonation of delay of 29 (Twenty Nine) days in filing the connected criminal revision petition before this Court.
2. Heard learned Additional Public Prosecution Mr. B. Sarma for the respondent State, who has raised no objection.
3. It is submitted that the delay was unintentional. There was no malafide on the part of the applicants.
4. Considering the submissions at the bar, the delay of 29 (Twenty Nine) days is condoned.
5. Registry to register the connected petition.
6. In terms of the above observation, this interlocutory application stands
disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant