Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5437 (CAL)

MANINDRA NATH PRADHAN v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

FMA/333/2022 · 2026-02-26

Partha Sarathi Sen, Sujoy Paul

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Ct.No.1 D/L 26.02.2026 07 Saikat Mukherjee FMA/333/2022 with IA NO: CAN/1/2022 MANINDRA NATH PRADHAN VS. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. Mr. Tarak Karan, Adv. ...For the Respondent-State Per, Partha Sarathi Sen, J. 1. None appears on behalf of the appellant even on second call. 2. Learned advocate for Respondent-State is present. 3. In view of such absence of the appellant, FMA 333 of 2022 is dismissed for default. 4. With the dismissal of the appeal, the pending interlocutory application(s) is/are also dismissed. (SUJOY PAUL, CJ.) (PARTHA SARATHI SEN, J.)