D.Jeyamurugan v. D.Rajalingam (Died) 2. Hemamalini
CMP(MD)/4994/2026 · 2026-07-20
P Vadamalai
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 54354 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 54354 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CMP(MD) NOS. 4994 to 4996 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 20-07-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE P.VADAMALAI CMP(MD) NOS. 4994 to 4996 of 2026 in AS(MD) NO. 85 of 2025 D.Jeyamurugan Petitioner(s) in all petitions Vs 1.D.Rajalingam (Died) 2.Hemamalini 3.Pavithra 4.Sudharsan 5.Surendran 6.Arthi 7.Azhagurathi 8.Suresh 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CMP(MD) NOS. 4994 to 4996 of 2026 9.Ajithkumar 10.Ramya Respondent(s) in all petitions For Petitioner(s) in all petitions : Mr.J.Barathan, Advocate For Respondent(s) in all petitions : Mr.P.Suresh, Advocate for R2 to R6 R7 to R10 – No Appearance R1 – Died Common Prayer : Civil Miscellaneous Petitions are filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, Order 22 Rule 9, and Order 22 Rule 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to condone the delay of 292 days in filing the application to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the deceased first respondent, to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the deceased first respondent, and to bring on record respondents 7 to 10 / proposed parties as the legal representatives of the deceased 1st respondent, namely D.Rajalingam, and array them as respondents 7 to 10 in the Appeal Suit in A.S.(MD)No.85 of 2025 on the file of this Court. 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CMP(MD) NOS. 4994 to 4996 of 2026 COMMON ORDER These Civil Miscellaneous Petitions have been filed to condone the delay of 292 days in filing the application to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the deceased 1st respondent, to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the deceased 1st respondent, and to bring on record respondents 7 to 10 as the legal representatives of the deceased 1st respondent and rank them as respondents 7 to 10 in A.S. (MD)No.85 of 2025 on the file of this Court. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the common affidavit filed in support of these petitions. 3. The learned counsel for respondents 2 to 6 has not raised any serious objections to these petitions. 4. The names of respondents 7 to 10 have been printed in the cause list. 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CMP(MD) NOS. 4994 to 4996 of 2026
5. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit, these Civil Miscellaneous Petitions are allowed.
20-07-2026 Note : The Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendments in the appeal memorandum. mkn 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CMP(MD) NOS. 4994 to 4996 of 2026 P.VADAMALAI, J. mkn CMP(MD) NOS. 4994 to 4996 of 2026 in AS(MD) NO. 85 of 2025 20.07.2026 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis