Date of pronouncement : 10.07.2026 Date of uploading : 18.07.2026 APHC010347072026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] FRIDAY, THE 10th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 18648/2026 Between: 1. SWATHI KUMAR VULLI, S/O. RAMA RAO AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/O. D NO. 76-8/1-37A, LALITHA NAGAR, BHAVANIPURAM MANDAL, NTR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P.522238. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, ANDHRA PRADESH, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. 522503. 3. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, KRISHNA DISTRICT, KRISHNA. 520001. 4. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT. 520001 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, VIJAYAWADA L-TOWN POLICE STATION, NTR DISTRICT. 520001. 6. KANURI HAH KRISHNA, SON OF SHAKARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, RESIDENT OF D.NO.27-14-98, MAHALSKHMI COMPLEX, SHOP NO.6 2ND FLOOR, GOVERNORPET, VIJAYAWADA. 520001 7. PALLANTI RAJU, SON OF NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, RESIDENT OF OPP TO SURYA KIRAN GOLD TESTING, D.NO.11- 2 MRK,J W.P.No.18648 of 2026 56-23, MARVADI TEMPLE STREET, I TOWN, VIJAYAWADA520001 8. PUNNANA MAHESH, SON OF NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS, RESIDENT OF D.NO.11-56-55, SHOPO NO.4, MARVADI TEMPLE STREET, I TOWN, VIJAYAWADA, 9. AJAY MANE, SON OF NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, RESIDENT OF D.NO.11-56-55, SHOP NO.4, MARVADI TEMPLE STREET, I TOWN VIJAYAWADA. 520001 10. PERUGU SITHARAM, SON OF NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, RESIDENT OF SHOP NO. 10, PILLI APPARAO COMPLEX, ZANDA LILNE, I TOWN VIJAYAWADA, CELL 520001. 11. VECTHA VENU, SON OF NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS RESIDENT OF D.NO.11-59-23A, JAMMU MASID STREET, I TOWN, VIJAYAWADA, ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents interfering in civil disputes of petitioner by summoning and pressurizing the petitioner to settle the matter, as illegal, without jurisdiction, amounting to malice-in-law and is violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to refrain from doing so, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents, not to interfere in any manner, whatsoever, in the civil disputes relating to the petitioner’s company, pending disposal of writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. AKULA VAMSI KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 MRK,J W.P.No.18648 of 2026 The Court made the following Order: Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, subsequent to the institution of the present Writ Petition, the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed. 2. Recording the said submission, this Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ______________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM, J Dated: 10.07.2026 MDP