Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
SL. No. Dat e Office Not es, r epor t s, or der s or pr oceedin gs or dir ect ion s an d Regist r ar ’s or der w it h Sign at u r es COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPCRL No. 574 of 2026 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.
1. Mr. Deepak Pethshali, learned counsel holding brief of Siddharath Bankoti, learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. Mr. Tumul Nainwal, learned AGA for the State.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there is no threat perception to the petitioners from any of the private respondents, therefore, petitioners are not pressing the instant petition.
4. In view of the submission, as given by the
learned counsel for the petitioner that there is no threat perception, the instant writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
(Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 13.05.2026 SKS