VIGNESH v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Muthiahpuram
CRL OP(MD)/14815/2026 · 2026-07-20
K Rajasekar
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 54315 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 54315 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRL OP(MD). No.14815 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 20/07/2026 PRESENT The HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR CRL OP(MD). No.14815 of 2026 Vignesh, S/o.Chellathurai, No.5/927, Bharathi Nagar, Thoothukudi District. ... Petitioner/Accused No.3 Vs State of Tamilnadu Rep by, The Inspector of Police, Muthiahpuram Police Station, Thoothukudi District. Crime No.416/2026. ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.Vikraman.S for Mr.Ashok S, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.N.Balasubramanian,
Counsel for State of TN (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS PRAYER :- C-8AB. For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.416/2026 on the file of the Respondent Police. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP(MD). No.14815 of 2026
ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/A3, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 296(b), 109(1) and 351(3) of BNS, 2023, in Crime No.416 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The petitioner was earlier arrested and released on bail by the learned Vacation Sessions Judge, Thoothukudi, in Crl.M.P.No.2386 of 2026, vide order dated 20.05.2026. Subsequently, the bail was cancelled in Crl.M.P.No.1236 of 2026 due to violation of certain conditions. Hence, the petitioner has come forward with the present anticipatory bail application. 3.When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned Counsel for State of TN (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent Police submitted that since the petitioner was earlier arrested and released on bail and his bail has been cancelled, the petition seeking anticipatory bail is not maintainable. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP(MD). No.14815 of 2026 4.Recording the same and without challenging the cancellation of bail order, the present petition is not maintainable. Hence, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. However, the petitioner has to work out his remedy only by challenging the cancellation order.
(K R S J)
20.07.2026 vsg TO
1. The Inspector of Police, Muthiahpuram Police Station, Thoothukudi District.
2. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP(MD). No.14815 of 2026 K. RAJASEKAR,J., vsg
ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.14815 of 2026 Date : 20/07/2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis