Date of reserved for orders : . . . . . . . . . Date of pronouncement : 09.07.2026 Date of uploading : 17.07.2026 APHC010145252022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3548] THURSDAY, THE 9th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA WRIT PETITION NO: 9130/2022 Between: 1. ANDRAJU LALITHA, W/O. VENKATESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC. MG. PARTNER OF M/S. SREE LALITHAA MARINES, OFFICE AT SY.NO.678/679, K. BITRAGUNTA VILLAGE, JARUGUMALLI MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 2. A. SIVA RAMA KRISHNA,, S/O. VENKATESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, OCC. PARTNER OF M/S. SREE LALITHAA MARINES, OFFICE AT SY.NO.678/679, K. BITRAGUNTA VILLAGE, JARUGUMALLI MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 3. A. VENKATESWARA RAO,, S/O. LATE SAMBASIVA RAO, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. DOOR NO.37-1-409/63, 4TH LINE, BHAGYA NAGAR, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPER INTENDENT OF POLICE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ONGOLE. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ONGOLE II TOWN POLICE STATION, ONGOLE. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, , ONGOLE, II TOWN POLICE STATION, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 5. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, 0/O. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 6. SRINIVAS, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC. PARTNER OF M/S. SRINIVASA AQUA, DISUMARRU ROAD, BHEEMAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 7. VIJAYARAM, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCC. PARTNER OF M/S. SRINIVASA AQUA, DISUMARRU ROAD, BHEEMAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 8. GRANDHI BALAJI, S/O.LATE VENKATESWAR RAO, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. DOOR NO.42, VENKATESAN 2 STREET, CHINTADRIPET, CHENNAI-II, TAMILNADU STATE. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the highhanded action on the part of the respondents No.3 to 5 in interfering with the business transaction between ourselves and the respondent No.6 to 7 and pressurizing us to get settle the issue with the respondents No.6 to 7 i.e., threatening us to execute the document in favor of the respondents No.6 and 7 with regard to our factory located at Sy.No.678/679, K. Bitragunta Village, Jarugumalli Mandal, Prakasam District under the guise that we are indebted to the respondents No.6 and 7 in business transactions as arbitrary, illegal, contrary to the procedure established by law, apart from being violative of fundamental rights guaranteed to us under Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents No.3 to 5 not to interfere with our business transaction between ourselves and the respondents No.6 and 7 and not to threaten us to sell/lease hold the factory located at Sy.No.678/679, K. Bitragunta Village, Jarugumalli Mandal, Prakasam District to the respondents No.6 and 7 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents No.3 to 5 not to interfere with our business transaction between ourselves and the respondents No.6 and 7 and not to threaten us to sell/lease hold the factory located at Sy.No.678/679, K. Bitragunta Village, Jarugumalli Mandal, Prakasam District to the respondents No.6 and 7, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. P V N KIRAN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: Mr.B.Siva Rama Krishna, learned counsel representing Mr.P.V.N.Kiran Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners, would submit that the matter has been rendered infructuous in view of efflux of time. 2. Owing to the submission so made, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA, J Date : 09-07-2026 BMS Whether the order is: Speaking ☑ Reasoned Reportable Non-reportable ☑