TARA YADAV AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
CRLP/20478/2026 · 2026-09-07
Jai Krishna Upadhyay, Siddhartha Varma
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5423 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5423 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 20478 of 2026 Court No. - 44 HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J.
HON'BLE JAI KRISHNA UPADHYAY, J.
1. Upon being informed that the charge sheet in the case has been submitted, learned counsel for the petitioners prays that the writ petition be dismissed as not pressed, leaving it open to avail such remedy as might be available under the law.
2. Learned AGA has no objection to the dismissal of the writ petition.
3. Under such circumstances, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed and liberty is granted to the petitioners to pursue such remedy as might be available to them. September 8, 2026 safi Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Prem Shankar Yadav, Ramesh Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Jai Krishna Upadhyay,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.) Tara Yadav And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAHBOOB SAFI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad