[2026:RJ-JP:10693] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4544/2026 1. Manisha Meena W/o Mukhtar Singh Meena, Age 45 years, R/o Village/post Chhatragang, Teh.- Kishanganj, District, Baran. 2. Manju Lata Jatav W/o Hari Shankar Yadav, Age 47 years, R/o Khajupura Chouraha, District, Baran. 3. Seema Kumari W/o Manoj Kumar, Age 43 years, R/o Chardana, Atru, District- Baran. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State of Rajasthan, through the Secretary, Department of School Education, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner. 3. Director, Elementary Education, Bikaner. 4. The District Education Officer (Elementary Education), Baran, Rajasthan. 5. The District Education Officer (Secondary Education), Baran, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioners : Mr. Hira Lal Gothwal Advocate. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 13/03/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, submitted that in the similar matter, i.e., Arjun Lal Meena & Others vs. State of Rajasthan & Others (S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18533/2025), Co-ordinate Bench of this Court has disposed of that writ petition vide order dated 03.12.2025 granting liberty to the petitioners therein to submit representation [2026:RJ-JP:10693] (2 of 2) [CW-4544/2026] to the respondents therein. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioners would be satisfied in case similar directions are issued in the present case as well. 2. In view of limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners, this Court deems it just and proper to dispose of this writ petition by granting liberty to the petitioners to submit representation in terms of directions issued by this Court in the case of Arjun Lal Meena & Others (supra). In case, any such representation along with certified copy of this order is submitted by the petitioners, the same shall be considered and decided by the respondents by passing speaking order within a period of 60 days from the date of its filing. 3. It is made clear that this Court has not commended upon the merits of the case. 4. Writ petition is disposed of accordingly. 5. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. (ANAND SHARMA),J MANOJ NARWANI /24