Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5420 (MAD)

G.Latchumappa v. The District Collector,

WP/10423/2026 · 2026-03-24

Abdul Quddhose

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 10423 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 24-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE WP No. 10423 of 2026 G.Latchumappa S/o.Goopaliyappa, No.3/502-E2, Thirumalai Nagar, Hosur, Krishnagiri District - 635 109. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector, Office of the District Collectorate, Krishnagiri District. 2. The District Revenue Officer, Office of the District Collectorate, Krishnagiri District. 3. The Sub Collector, Office of the Sub Collectorate, Hosur, Krishnagiri District - 635 109. 4. The Tahsildar, Office of the Tahsildar, Hosur, Krishnagiri District - 635 109. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER – This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 4 to __________ Page1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 10423 of 2026 consider the petitioner’s representation dated 27.01.2026 and grant patta to the petitioners house site in S.F.No.544/2. For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.Arun For Respondent(s): Mr.D.Ravichander, Special Government Pleader O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondents to issue free house site patta in favour of the petitioner for the property morefully disclosed in the affidavit filed in support of this Writ Petition based on the petitioner’s representation dated 27.01.2026, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 2.The petitioner claims that as per the Government Schemes, he is entitled for the grant of patta for the property morefully disclosed in the affidavit filed in support of this Writ Petition. He had given a representation on 27.01.2026 to the respondents requesting them to grant patta for the subject property. Since the same was not considered, he has filed this Writ Petition. 3.Mr.D.Ravichander, learned Special Government Pleader, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 4.No prejudice would be caused to the respondents if the petitioner’s representations as stated supra is considered on merits and in accordance with __________ Page2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 10423 of 2026 law, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner’s representation. 5.For the foregoing reasons, this Court directs the 4th respondent to pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner’s representation dated 27.01.2026, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6.With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. However, there shall be no order as to costs. 24-03-2026 Index : Yes/No GSA To 1. The District Collector, Office of the District Collectorate, Krishnagiri District. 2. The District Revenue Officer, Office of the District Collectorate, Krishnagiri District. __________ Page3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 10423 of 2026 ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J. GSA 3. The Sub Collector, Office of the Sub Collectorate, Hosur, Krishnagiri District - 635 109. 4. The Tahsildar, Office of the Tahsildar, Hosur, Krishnagiri District - 635 109. WP No. 10423 of 2026 24-03-2026 __________ Page4 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis