Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5417 (GAU)

Achung Natung and Anr v. The State of AP

Crl.Petn./14/2026 · 2026-05-05

Anjan Moni Kalita

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC040001072026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : Crl.Petn./14/2026 Achung Natung and Anr Son of Dugu Natung, resident of Village 6 Mile, Po and PS Itanagar, Papum Pare District, Arunachal Pradesh. 2: Kabak Tashi Age: Occupation : Son of Late Kabak Chod resident of Village 6 Mile Itanagar PO and PS Itanagar Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh VERSUS The State of AP represented by the PP of AP Advocate for the Petitioner : Teto Taba, Punung Borang,Nimcha Hondique,Vijay Duku Raji,Nang walika Jenow,C Ering,Begi Taba Advocate for the Respondent : P P of AP, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJAN MONI KALITA ORDER Date : 06-05-2026 Heard Mr. B. Taba, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. T. Ete, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Page No.# 2/2 The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that inadvertently certain mistake has been committed in filing the instant criminal petition and therefore, he prays for withdrawal of the matter to file a fresh. Mr. T. Ete, learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that he does not have any objection to the aforesaid prayer, provided that the interim order so passed in the instant case is vacated. Taking into consideration the whole aspect of matter, this Court is of the considered opinion that the prayer of the petitioner could be allowed. Therefore, the matter stands closed on withdrawal with a liberty to file a fresh, if so advised. Interim order so passed earlier on 28.01.2026 is vacated. JUDGE Comparing Assistant