Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5417 (ALL)

VED PRAKASH v. GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ANOTHER

A227/12367/2026 · 2026-09-08

Rohit Ranjan Agarwal

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 12367 of 2026 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed seeking a direction upon Judge, Small Cause Court/Civil Judge (Senior Division), Ghaziabad to decide 6-C application filed in Original Suit No.470 of 2021. 2. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to private respondents, with a direction upon Judge, Small Cause Court/Civil Judge (Senior Division), Ghaziabad to decide 6-C application filed in Original Suit No.470 of 2021, in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of one month from the date of production of certified copy of this order. 3. With the aforesaid direction, present writ petition stands disposed of. 4. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the case on merit. 5. Sri Umesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel has appeared for respondent no.1. September 9, 2026 SK Goswami Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Ved Prakash .....Petitioner(s) Ghaziabad Development Authority And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHIVAKANT GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad