Ajmath Husen v. The State rep by the Inspector of Police
CRL OP/19366/2026 · 2026-07-21
C Kumarappan
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 54160 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 54160 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Crl.O.P.No.19366 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 21.07.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN Crl.O.P.No.19366 of 2026 Ajmath Husen
... Petitioner(s) Vs. The State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Amaravathi Police Station, Tiruppur City
... Respondent(s) Crime No.34 of 2026 PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No.34 of 2026 pending investigation on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner(s) : No appearance For Respondent(s) : Mr.S.Yogaraj Sekar, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ORDER There is no representation for the petitioner when the matter is called.
2. The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 17.04.2026 for the alleged offences under Sections 296(b) and 103 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, in Crime No.34 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.19366 of 2026
3. It is the case of the prosecution that the petitioner suspected the fidelity of his wife and murdered his mother-in-law, who had given shelter to his wife. Hence, the case.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent police, while opposing the grant of bail, reiterated the prosecution case and, on instructions, submitted that this is a case of gruesome murder in which the deceased sustained as many as ten stab injuries and that the investigation is still pending. It was further submitted that, if the petitioner is enlarged on bail, there is every possibility of his tampering with witnesses.
5. Though there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, considering the submission of the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) that the investigation is still pending and having regard to the nature and gravity of the allegations levelled against the petitioner, this Court is of the view that it would not be appropriate to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage.
6. Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 21.07.2026 skr 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.19366 of 2026 To
1. The learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Udumalpet
2. The Superintendent, Central Prison, Coimbatore
3. The Inspector of Police, Amaravathi Police Station, Tiruppur City
4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.19366 of 2026 C.KUMARAPPAN,J. skr Crl.O.P.No.19366 of 2026 21.07.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis