Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5416 (GAU)

Smti Dubi Ete Lollen v. THE STATE OF AP

AB/36/2026 · 2026-05-05

Anjan Moni Kalita

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC040005742026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : AB/36/2026 Smti Dubi Ete Lollen D/o Shri Kido Ete, R/o Paya Village, P.O/P.S Aalo, West Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh and presently residing at D Sector, near High Court, Naharlagun, PO/PS Naharlagun, Papum Pare District, Arunachal Pradesh. VERSUS THE STATE OF AP represented by Public Prosecutor. Advocate for the Petitioner : Jambey Tsering Kee, Techi Topu Advocate for the Respondent : P P of AP, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJAN MONI KALITA ORDER Date : 06.05.2026 Heard Mr. T. Topu, learned counsel for the accused applicant. Also heard Mr. G. Tado, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. Vide order dated 28.04.2026, this Court allowed the interim prayer of the accused applicant and she was granted interim bail with a direction to cooperate with the investigation and to appear before the Investigating Officer as and Page No.# 2/2 when called for. 3. Mr. Topu, learned counsel for the accused applicant, submits that after passing of the interim order, she has never been called by the I.O. and since she is willing to cooperate with the investigation, the interim order dated 28.04.2026 should be made absolute. 4. On the other hand, Mr. Tado, learned Addl. P.P., submits that she has not appeared before the I.O. of the case and has not cooperated with the investigation and, therefore, opposes the bail. 5. Case Diary has been produced before this Court and the same is perused. 6. Taking into account the entire facts and the aspect that she was cooperating with the investigation prior to filing of the instant anticipatory bail application, and since she is already on interim bail, this Court is of the considered opinion that the interim order dated 28.04.2026 should be made absolute. However, it is directed that the accused applicant shall appear before the I.O. of the case within a period of 10 (ten) days from the date of passing of this order. The other terms and conditions of her interim bail, which is made absolute, shall remain the same. 7. Case Diary be returned. 8. The anticipatory bail application stands disposed of JUDGE Comparing Assistant