CRL OP No. 19081 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 17-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY CRL OP No. 19081 of 2026 1. Harihara Sudhan 2. Saravanan 3. Diwakar A ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. State by Inspector of Police, The Inspector of Police , N-4, Fishing Harbour Police Station, Royapuram, Chennai 600 013. Crime No. 31 of 2026. 2. Disingu ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS, praying to call for the record pertaining to FIR in Cr.No.31 of 2026, on the file of the respondent police by way of compromise and to quash the same, and pass such further or other order or orders as this Honble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and thus render Justice. For Petitioner(s): Mr.J.B.Solomon Peter Kamal Doss For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Rajasekaran, Government Advocate (Crl. Side), for R1 M/s.M.A.Praveena, for R2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 19081 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 ORDER This Criminal Original Petition seeks to quash the FIR in Crime No.31 of 2026 on the file of the first respondent for alleged offences under Sections 126(2), 296(2) and 115(2) of BNS, on the ground of compromise between the parties. The parties are present before the court and, on examination, stand by their compromise and do not want the case to proceed further. 2. The broad contours of the High Court's power to exercise extraordinary jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. and Section 528 of the BNSS in respect of compromise of non-compoundable offences are laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Gian Singh -Vs- State of Punjab and Another (2012 10 SCC 303) and other subsequent judgments. 3. The background facts in which this case arises is that on account of enmity, the accused have way laid the de facto complainant and abused him in filthy language and also attacked with their hands and the de facto complainant suffered bleeding injuries in his mouth and lips. The parties have now ironed out their differences between them. 4. Thus, it can be seen that this matter is a fit case for the exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction to quash the case on compromise. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 19081 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 5. Accordingly, this CRL OP No. 19081 of 2026 stands allowed. The FIR in Crime No.31 of 2026 on the file of the first respondent stands quashed. 17-07-2026 Neutral Citation: No PVS To 1. The Inspector of Police. N-4, Fishing Harbour Police Station, Royapuram, Chennai 600 013. Crime No. 31 of 2026. 2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 19081 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J. PVS CRL OP No. 19081 of 2026 17-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis