Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5414 (KAR)

SHRI. BANAKARA SUBHASHA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/102866/2023 · 2026-02-06

V Srishananda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1854 CRL.P No. 102866 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 102866 OF 2023 (482(CR.PC)/528(BNSS)-) BETWEEN: SHRI. BANAKARA SUBHASHA S/O. BANAKARA KOTRAPPA, AGE. 63 YEARS, CC. AGRICULTURIST, R/O. THAMBRAHALLI VILLAGE, TALUK. HAGARIBOMMANAHALLI (H.B. HALLI), DIST. VIJAYANAGARA-583212. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VIDYASHANKAR G. DALWAI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS P.S.I., T.B. HALLI POLICE STATION, R/BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDING, DHARWAD-580011. 2. ANNAPURNAMMA W/O. BANAKARA KOTRAPPA AGE. 76 YEARS, OCC. NIL, R/O. THAMBRAHALLI VILLAGE, TALUK. HAGARBOMMANAHALLI (H.B. HALLI), DIST. VIJAYANAGARA-583212. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. KIRTILATA R. PATIL, HCGP FOR R1; SRI. G.M. BHAT, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/SEC. 482 OF CR.P.C. SEEKING TO QUASH ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS AGAINST PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.12 IN C.C.NO. 432/2022 (CRIME NO. 0008/2021 OF T.B.HALLI PS) FOR OFFENCES P/U/SEC. 504 OF IPC AND SEC. 24 OF MAINTENANCE AND WELFARE OF PARENTS AND SENIOR CITIZENS ACT, 2007, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE. Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench. - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1854 CRL.P No. 102866 of 2023 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo for withdrawal. The memo reads as under: "MEMO The petitioner herein is elder son of respondent No.2 herein and she filed complaint against her all sons and their family, except petitioner herein. Even though there is no complaint against petitioner, by looking genealogy of respondent No.2, police filed charge sheet against all sons including petitioner herein. Admitted fact as even though respondent No.2 is residing with her daughter, petitioners is giving monthly medical expense. Considering this aspect, give liberty to move discharge application before trial court in the interest of justice.” 2. Placing the memo on record, petition is dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty as prayed for. Sd/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE AC Ct-cmu LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 28