- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:2572 RSA No. 47 of 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.47 OF 2008 (SP) BETWEEN: 1. SHRI RUDRAPPA S/O. RAMAPPA PATTANASHETTY, AGE: 63 YEARS, OCC: AGRIL. R/O. BHAGOJIKOPPA, TALUK: RAMADURG, DIST. BELGAUM. 2. SMT. SHANTAVVA W/O. BASAWANNEPPA PATTANSHETTY, AGE: 49 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O. BHAGOJIKOPPA, TALUK: RAMADURG, DIST. BELGAUM. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI CHETAN MUNNOLI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SHRI LAXMAPPA S/O. KENCHAPPA ITNAL, SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS. 1A. SMT. BASAVVA W/O. LAKSHMAPPA ITNAL, AGE: 77 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD. 1B. KENCHAPPA S/O. LAKSHMAPPA ITNAL, AGE: 57 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE. 1C. LAKKAPPA S/O. LAKSHMAPPA ITNAL, AGE: 54 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE. 1D. PARASAPPA S/O. LAKSHMAPPA ITNAL, Digitally signed by MALLIKARJUN RUDRAYYA KALMATH Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:2572 RSA No. 47 of 2008 AGE: 50 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE. 1E. SMT. UDDAVVA W/O. BASAPPA PARIVAL, AGE: 46 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD. 1F. SMT. IRAVVA W/O. KAMAPPA HORATTI, AGE: 44 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD. 1G. SIDDAPPA S/O. LAKSHMAPPA ITNAL, AGE: 38 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, ALL ARE R/O. MELLIKERI-591129, TQ. SAVADATTI, DIST. BELAGAVI. 2. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, LAND ACQUISITION, REHABILITATION AND RECONSTRUCTION MAJOR IRRIGATION, BELGAUM. 3. THE SPL. LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, HIDKAL DAM, BELGAUM. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI SANGRAM S. KULKARNI, ADV. FOR R1(A TO G); SRI PRAVEENA DEVAREDDIYAVAR, HCGP FOR R2 & R3) THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 03.07.2007 IN R.A.NO.8/2022 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE, AT: BELGAUM RESTORING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 16.01.2002 IN O.S.NO.53/1996 ON THE FILE OF CIVIL JUDGE (SR. DVN.) AT SAUNDATTI, THE SAID SUIT BE DISMISSED AND THIS APPEAL BE ALLOWED WITH COSTS THROUGHOUT. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR FURTHER ARGUMENTS, THIS DAY JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:2572 RSA No. 47 of 2008 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR) Case is called. The appellants and respondents and their respective counsels were present on 18.02.2026. The counsels for both parties have filed duly signed compromise petition under Order XXIII Rule 3 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. 2. Under the compromise, it is stated that the suit is filed by the plaintiffs for the relief of specific performance of contract. On the advice made by the elders and well wishers both appellants and respondents compromised the case and filed this petition. 3. Both appellants and respondents have amicably settled the matter and have accordingly compromised the case. 4. According to the compromise petition, both the parties prayed to draw decree as per the compromise petition. 5. The contents of the compromise petition explained to the parties to the suit in the language known to them. They admit its contents and they have stated that, they have - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:2572 RSA No. 47 of 2008 subscribed their signatures on the compromise petition after understanding its contents. 6. The compromise entered into by the parties is legal and appears to be voluntary. Hence, it is accepted. Thus, the suit is decreed in terms of compromise petition. 7. Office is hereby directed to draw decree. The compromise petition shall be treated as part and parcel of the compromise decree. Sd/- (HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR) JUDGE PMP /CT-AN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 17