Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement :10.07.2026 Date of uploading : 17.07.2026 APHC010416222008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3458] FRIDAY, THE 10th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 15754/2008 Between: 1. C. VARADHAIAH NAIDU, CHITTOOR DIST., S/O. MUNASWAMY NAIDU EX-PRESIDENT, THODATHARA P.A.C.S., THAVANAMPALLE MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTIRCT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE D R / D C O CHITTOOR DIST 3 ANO, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 2. THE CHITTOOR DISTRICT COOPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER. 3. A K PRABHAKARA REDDY, S/O. KRISHNA REDDY SECRETARY (UNDER SUSPENSION), R/O. EGUVA THAVANAMPALLE VILLAGE, THAVANAMPALLE MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. THE A P COOPERATIVE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD REP BY ITS, SECRETARY, 7TH FLOOR, CHANDRAVIHAR BUILDING COMPLEX, M.J.ROAD, NAMPALLY, HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records in C.T.A.No. 58 of 2005 and the orders dated 09.04.2008 on the file of the A.P.Cooperative Tribunal, Hyderabad, and the orders passed by the 1st respondnet in his proceedings in 2 Rc.No. 279/2001-B, dated 20.12.2003 and quash them as being illegal, arbitrary, unjust, violative of rule of natural justice and against the provisions of A.P.Cooperative Societies Act, 1964 and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2008(WPMP 20409 OF 2008 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the orders of the A.P.Cooperative Tribunal, Hyderabad in C.T.A. No. 58 of 2005, dt. 09.04.2008, conmfirming the proceedings of the of the 1st respondent in Rc.No. 279/2001-B, dt. 20.12.2003, pending disposal of the writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S V MUNI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. K KISHOR KUMAR REDDY 2. SRINIVAS POLAVARAPU 3. GP FOR COOPERATION WRIT PETITION NO: 16039/2008 Between: 1. C. VARADHAIAH NAIDU, CHITTOOR DIST., S/O. MUNASWAMY NAIDU EX. PRESIDENT, THODATHARA P.A.C.S THAVANAMPALLE MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE DY REGISTRAR/DIVISIONAL COOP OFFICER 2 OTHERS, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 2. THE A P COOPERATIVE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD REP BY ITS, SECRETARY, 7TH FLOOR, CHANDRAVIHAR BUILDING COMPLEX, M.J. ROAD, NAMPALLY, HYDERABAD. 3. A K PRABHAKARA REDDY, S/O. KRISHNA REDDY SECRETARY (UNDER SUSPENSION) AGED 58 YRS R./O. EGUVA THAVANAMPALLE VILLAGE, THAVANAMPALLE MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 3 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari calling for the records in C.T.A.No. 1 of 2006 and the Orders dt. 9-4-2008 on the file of the A.P. Cooperative Tribunal, Hyderabad and the Orders passed by the 1st Respondent in his proceedings in Rc No. 279/2001-B dt. 20-12-2003 and quash them as being illegal, arbitrary unjust violative of rule of natural justice and against the Provisions of A.P. Cooperative Societies Act 1964 and to pass such other and further orders IA NO: 1 OF 2008(WPMP 20482 OF 2008 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of the Certified copies of CTA No. 1/2006 of the 2nd respondent Proceedings in Rc No. 279/2001-B dt. 20-12-2003 of the 1st Respondent and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S V MUNI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR COOPERATION (AP) 2. GP FOR COOPERATION The Court made the following: 4 COMMON ORDER:- Learned counsel for the petitioner represented that the petitioner died. Learned counsel further submits that as per his information, the deceased was not survived by any legal heirs. 2. The representation made by learned counsel for the petitioner is recorded. 3. Recording the said submission, the writ petitions are dismissed as abated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA Dated: 10.07.2026 ANI Whether the order is: Speaking ✓ Reasoned Reportable Non-reportable ✓ 5 121 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NOs:15754 and 16039 of 2008 Dated: 10.07.2026 ANI