- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:2071 CRL.P No. 100490 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 100490 OF 2023 (482(CR.PC)/528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: 1. ASHOK NAYAK S/O. MANAPPA NAYAK, AGE. 33 YEARS, OCC. F.D.A. A. R. S. FARM, R/O. JAYANAGARA, SATHYANARAYANAPETE, GANGAVATHI, KOPPAL DISTRICT-583283. 2. GODI NAGARAJA S/O. MAKAPPA GODI AGE. YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. HULIHYADAR VILLAGE, KANAKAGIRI TALUK, KOPPAL DISTRICT-583283. 3. KANAKARAYA @ T. P. KANAKA S/O. SHAMANNA TALWAR AGE. YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. HULIHYADAR VILLAGE, KANAKAGIRI TALUK, KOPPAL DISTRICT-583283. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. CHETAN DESAI AND SRI. RAJA RAGHAVENDRA, ADVOCATES) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA, THROUGH GANGAVATHI TOWN P.S., KOPPAL DISTRICT, R/BY ITS ADDL. STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ADVOCATE GENERAL OFFICE, DHARWAD. 2. HANUMANTAPPA S/O. RAJAPPA GADDI, AGE. 64 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. HULIHYADAR, KANAKAGIRI, KOPPAL DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Date: 2026.02.12 16:54:44 +0530 - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:2071 CRL.P No. 100490 of 2023 THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS IN CRIME NO. 263/2022, PENDING ON THE FILE OF PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND (JR. DN) AND JMFC COURT, GANGAVATHI, KOPPAL DISTRICT, FILED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT POLICE ON THE BASIS OF THE COMPLAINT OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT. AND ALLOW THIS CRIMINAL PETITION BY QUASHING THE FIR FILED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT POLICE IN CRIME NO. 263/2022 FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 306 OF IPC AND CONSEQUENT PROCEEDINGS, PENDING ON THE FILE OF PRL. CIVIL JUDGE (JR. DN) AND JMFC COURT, GANGAVATHI, KOPPAL DISTRICT, AS AGAINST THE PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO. 5, 7 AND 8 HEREIN, TO SERVE THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE. THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA) 1. Despite granting sufficient time, the office objections have not been complied with. 2. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE SMM, CT:CMU LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 18