Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5405 (JHR)

SACHIT SAHU v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./11808/2025 · 2026-03-17

Deepak Roshan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:7230 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 11808 of 2025 --------- Sachit Sahu aged about 19 Years S/o Late Magan Sahu R/o Village-Tengariya Newatoli P.O. & P.S.-Palkot District-Gumla (Jharkhand). ....Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand. ....Opp. Party --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. K.S. Nanda, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Ms. Shweta Singh, A.P.P. --------- 03/Dated:-17.03.2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The instant bail application has been preferred by the petitioner for grant of regular bail for the offences registered under Sections 310(2) & 311 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023 in connection with Mufassil P.S. Case No. 26/2025. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and he has committed no offence as alleged in the F.I.R. He further submits that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. nor any incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. He further submits that two co-accused persons namely Sahil Nayak @ Sahit Nayak and Sahindar Gwala @ Chote Gwala have been granted bail by this court in B.A. No. 11747 of 2025 and B.A. No.207 of 2026 respectively and the petitioner for no offence has been languishing in custody since 16.10.2025; as such, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. He submits that the petitioner is ready to abide by every condition as imposed by this court. 4. Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. 5. Having regard to the facts of the case and looking to the allegations made against this petitioner coupled with the fact that the co-accused persons having same and similar allegations have already been granted bail and that the petitioner is in custody since 16.10.2025; therefore, I am inclined to enlarge this petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Simdega in connection with Mufassil P.S. Case No. 26/2025. 6. It is made clear that the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the learned trial court and he shall not threaten any witnesses and shall co- operate in trial and if any adverse report will come against this petitioner, learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of this petitioner. (Deepak Roshan, J.) MARCH 17, 2026 vikas/- uploaded 19.03.2026