Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 54007 (KAR)

BHEEMAPPA K S/O CHANDRAMMA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/105509/2025 · 2026-02-04

V Srishananda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1562 CRL.P No. 105509 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 105509 OF 2025 (438(CR.PC)/482(BNSS)) BETWEEN: BHEEMAPPA K. S/O CHANDRAMMA AGE. 40 YEARS, OCC. SOCIETY WORK, R/O. MADIHALLI, TQ. HARAPANAHALLI, DIST. VIJAYANAGAR 583125. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHIVANAND MALASHETTI, ADVOCATE) AND: THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, THROUGH ARASIKERE POLICE STATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNAKATA, DHARWAD BENCH, AT. DHARWAD 580001. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. P.N. HATTI, HCGP) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF BNSS (U/S 438 OF CR.P.C.), PRAYING TO ALLOW THE PETITION AND GRANT ANTICIPATORY BAIL AND ENLARGE THE PETITIONER/ACCUSED ON ANTICIPATORY BAIL IN ARASIKERE P.S. CRIME NO.146/2025 FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 316(2), 316(4), 318(4) OF BNS, PENDING ON THE FILE OF PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND (JR. DN) AND JMFC COURT AT HARAPANAHALLI, BY ALLOWING THIS PETITION IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Date: 2026.02.04 14:56:59 +0530 - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1562 CRL.P No. 105509 of 2025 ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA) Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition. The memo reads as under: "The Advocate for the petitioner humbly begs to submits as under: That during pendency of present petition the petitioner has been arrested by the police on 13/1/2026. Therefore, the petitioner filed the present petition for anticipatory bail in the present petition. Hence above petition does not survive for consideration. Hence petitioner crave leave of this Hon’ble Court to permit the petitioner to withdraw the petition with liberty to file fresh by filing regular petition for bail by allowing this memo in the interest of justice and equity. Hence, this memo. ” Placing the memo on record, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Sd/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE SMM, CT:CMU LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 9