[2026:JHHC:5035] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.11422 of 2025 ------ Saheb Singh @ Sabbey, aged about 25 years, son of Late Jagdish Singh, resident of Dimna Road, Mango, Swarn Rekha Project Colony, P.O. & P.S. – Olidih, Mango Town Jamshedpur, District East Singhbhum, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Anurag Kashyap, Advocate Ms. Supriya Dayal, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Anuradha Sahay, Addl.P.P. ------ Order No:-03 Dated:-19-02-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Mango Olidih P.S. Case No.94 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 103(1), 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons, committed murder of the son of the informant namely Nankhu Lal. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that the petitioner is not named in the FIR and he has been implicated in this case only on the basis of the confessional statement of the co-accused – Krishna Singh @ Lalla @ Krishna and Jasbir Singh @ Vicky Singh @ Jasbir Singh Vicky and the only role, they have attributed to the petitioner is to provide firm arm to them, with which the murder took place. It is then submitted that both Krishna Singh @ Lalla @ Krishna and Jasbir Singh @ Vicky Singh @ Jasbir Singh Vicky have been admitted to bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 05.12.2025 passed in B.A. No. 9624 of 2025 and the order dated 07.10.2025 passed in B.A. No. 5992 of 2025 respectively. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 08.09.2025 as mentioned in para-14 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb informant or witness of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Jamshedpur in connection with Mango Olidih P.S. Case No.94 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the informant or witness of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 19.02.2026 Saroj/