Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 540 (KAR)

SRI VENKATESHA, v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/9231/2026 · 2026-04-02

R Devdas

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17988 WP No. 9231 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 9231 OF 2026 (LR) BETWEEN: SRI. VENKATESHA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS S/O LATE GIRIYAPPA RESIDENT OF HARTHI VILLAGE, HARTHI POST, KASABA HOBLI, MAGADI TALUK BANGALORE SOUTH DISTRICT - 562 120. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MANJUNATHA H.R, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BANGALORE SOUTH DISTRICT RAMANAGARA - 562 159. 3. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER RAMANAGARA SUB DIVISION RAMANAGARA - 562 159. Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17988 WP No. 9231 of 2026 4. THE TAHSILDAR MAGADI TALUK MAGADI - 562 120. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B.P. RADHA, AGA) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASHING IMPUGNED ORDER/NOTIFICATION IN FORM 2E WHICH IS UNDATED AND UNNUMBERED PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 TO AN EXTENT OF 1 ACRE 35 GUNTAS (OUT OF TOTAL EXTENT OF 3 ACRES 4 GUNTAS) IN SY.NO.108 SITUATED AT SIDIGANAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, MAGADI TALUK, BANGALORE SOUTH DISTRICT, DECLARING THE SAID PORTION OF LAND OF PETITIONER AS UNRECORDED HABITUATED AND NAMED AS SIDIGANAHALLI COLONY AS PER ORDER BEARING NO.RA.JI.KA/BHO.SHA/UPAGRAMA/01/2025- 26 PUBLISHED IN KARNATAKA OFFICIAL GAZETTE ON 14.11.2025 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned Additional Government Advocate takes notice for all the respondents. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17988 WP No. 9231 of 2026 2. Although, the matter is coming up for preliminary hearing, with the consent of the learned counsel for petitioner and the learned Additional Government Advocate the matter is taken up for final disposal. 3. In this writ petition, the petitioner is aggrieved of the impugned notification issued by the Deputy Commissioner exercising powers under Section 38A of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 declaring certain areas as ‘unrecorded habitation’, which also includes the lands belonging to the petitioner. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there are several judgments of this Court including a batch of writ petitions in W.P.No.101121/2022 and connected matters, which were disposed of on 23.01.2024, followed by orders passed in W.P.No.9321/2024 dated 22.01.2025 and W.P.No.103974/2022 dated 28.02.2025, where this Court has clearly held that the Court has come across - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17988 WP No. 9231 of 2026 several matters where notifications under Section 38A of the Act 1961 have been issued by Deputy Commissioners without issuing any public notice and/or even verifying the revenue records. The Deputy Commissioners were advised that in future they shall firstly look into the revenue records, obtain the details as regards the lands which are proposed to be notified under Section 38A of the Act before issuing any notification. It was directed that if entries are found in the revenue records showing an individual as the kathedar, then notices will have to be issued to such persons who are the recorded kathedars. It was directed that if no entries are found, then the Deputy Commissioner will have to record such a statement that no entries are found in the revenue records, so that in the event of any challenge being raised, the Deputy Commissioner can fall back on the said information. 5. This Court has also considered the powers of the Deputy Commissioner as contained in Section 38A(1). The provision reads as follows; - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17988 WP No. 9231 of 2026 “(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act or any other law for the time being in force, where in any village, agricultural labourer is ordinarily residing on dwelling house on a land not belonging to him in an unrecorded habitations like Lambani Tanda, Gollarahatti, Vaddarahatti, Kurubarhatti, Nayakarahatti, Majare Grama, Haadi, Doddi, Palya, Camp, Colony or any other such unrecorded habitations falling within the jursidiction of that village, on the date of commencement of the Karnataka Land Reforms (Amendment) Act, 2016, which is notified as such by the Deputy Commissioner, specifying the survey numbers and boundaries in the pre scribed manner, such dwelling house or houses along with the site thereof and land immediately appurtenant thereto and necessary for its enjoyment shall, on the date of such notification by the Deputy Commissioner, vest absolutely in the State Government, free from all encumbrances and the agricultural labourer shall be entitled to be registered as owner thereof.” 6. It is therefore clear that if the revenue records disclose the fact that the lands are standing in the name of a private individual, then it will not permit the Deputy Commissioner to record the same as ‘unrecorded habitations’. In that view of the matter, it is clear that in all cases where the revenue records would reveal or - 6 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17988 WP No. 9231 of 2026 disclose the name of a private individual as the kathedar, then it would divest the Deputy Commissioner from power to proceed as ‘unrecorded habitation’. From a perusal of the RTC extract and revenue records at Annexure-C series it is evident that the name of the petitioner was entered in the same and that the petitioner is the khatedar of the said land. 7. In that view of the matter, the writ petition is allowed. The impugned notification at Annexure-A bearing No.Ra.Ji.Ka/Bho.Sha/Upagrama/01/2025-26 is hereby quashed and set aside. Consequently, it is hereby directed that respondents - Tahsildar, Magadi Taluk and the Deputy Commissioner, Ramanagara District, shall immediately restore the name of the petitioner in the revenue records. Ordered accordingly. - 7 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17988 WP No. 9231 of 2026 Learned Additional Government Advocate is permitted to file memo of appearance within a period of four weeks from today. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE rv List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8