Shyam @ Divakar v. The State Rep. by, The Inspector of Police
CRL OP/19120/2026 · 2026-07-20
D Bharatha Chakravarthy
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 53982 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 53982 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRL OP No. 19120 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 20-07-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY CRL OP No. 19120 of 2026
1. Shyam @ Divakar
2. Suriya
3. Manimaran Petitioner(s) Vs
1. The State Rep by, The Inspector of Police, R-6, Kumaran Nagar Police Station, Chennai. Cr.No.57 of 2026. 2. Deepak Respondent(s) PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS, to call for the records relating to the case in Crime No.57 of 2026 on the file of the 1st Respondent and quash the same. For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.Sabarinathan For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Rajasekaran Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for R1 1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 19120 of 2026 ORDER This Criminal Original Petition seeks to quash the First Information Report in Crime No.57 of 2026 on the file of the 1st respondent for alleged offences under Sections 126(2), 296(b), 115(2), 118(1) and 351(3) of BNS, 2023, on the ground of compromise between the parties. The parties are present before the court and, on examination, stand by their compromise and do not want the case to proceed further. 2. The broad contours of the High Court's power to exercise extraordinary jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Cr.p.c. and Section 528 of the BNSS in respect of compromise of non-compoundable offences are laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Gian Singh-Vs- State of Punjab and Another (2012 10 SCC 303) and other subsequent judgments. 3. The brief facts leading to the instant case are that, while the de facto complainant was travelling on his two wheeler, the accused were standing on the road, blocking the pathway and there ensued quarrel. It is further submitted that there was also a counter case, in which already a compromise has been recorded. The parties have ironed out their differences. 2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 19120 of 2026
4. Thus, it can be seen that this matter is a fit case for the exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction to quash the case on compromise. 5. Accordingly, this Crl.O.P.No.19120 of 2026 stands allowed. The FIR in Crime No.57 of 2026 on the file of the first respondent police stands quashed. 20-07-2026 Jd Neutral Citation:Yes/No To
1. The Inspector of Police, R-6, Kumaran Nagar Police Station, Chennai. 2. The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court.
3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 19120 of 2026 D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY J. jd CRL OP No. 19120 of 2026 20-07-2026 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis