CRL OP No. 18345 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 14-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY CRL OP No. 18345 of 2026 1. D.Muthuselvam S/o. Duraikannu, No.1/14, North Street, Malaiyanur Village, Veppur Taluk, Cuddalore District-606 108. 2. R. Kolanchiyammal W/o. Raja, No.167, Nor 90th Street, Malaiyanur Village, Veppur Taluk, Cuddalore District-606 108. 3. R. Chandru S/o. Raja, No.167, Nor 90th Street, Malaiyanur Village, Veppur Taluk, Cuddalore District-606 108. 4. R. Viswanathan S/o. Raja, No.167, Nor 90th Street, Malaiyanur Village, Veppur Taluk, Cuddalore District-606 108. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The State rep by the Sub Inspector of Police Sirupakkam Police Station, Cuddalore District. Crime No.183/2023 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 18345 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 2. C. Anandhan S/o. Chinnasamy, Malaiyanur Village, Veppur Taluk, Cuddalore District-606 108. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS, to call for the records relating to FIR in Crime No.183 of 2023 on the file of the 1st Respondent Police, quash the same by allowing this Criminal Original Petition and pass such other further orders as this Honorable Court. For Petitioner(s): Mr.D.Pazhani For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Rajasekaran Government Counsel (Crl. Side) for R1 ORDER This Criminal Original Petition seeks to quash FIR in Crime No.183 of 2023 on the file of the 1st respondent Police for alleged offences under Sections 448, 342, 294(b), 323, 324, 506(ii) of IPC r/w. Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, 2002, on the ground of compromise between the parties. The parties are present before the court and, on examination, stand by their compromise and do not want the case to proceed further. 2. The broad contours of the High Court's power to exercise extraordinary jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Cr.p.c. and Section 528 of the BNSS in https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 18345 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 respect of compromise of non-compoundable offences are laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Gian Singh -Vs- State of Punjab and Another (2012 10 SCC 303) and other subsequent judgments. 3. The gist of facts leading to the instant case is that it is a dispute between the relatives relating to property and subsequently, the parties have ironed out the differences between them. 4. Thus, it can be seen that this matter is a fit case for the exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction to quash the case on compromise. 5. Accordingly, this Crl.O.P. No.18345 of 2026 stands allowed. The FIR in Crime No.183 of 2023 on the file of the 1st respondent Police stands quashed. 14-07-2026 Neutral Citation: No KKN https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 18345 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J. KKN To 1. The Sub Inspector of Police, Sirupakkam Police Station, Cuddalore District. 2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras, Chennai. CRL OP No. 18345 of 2026 14-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis