W.P. Crl. No.66 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 13.07.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN W.P. Crl. No.66 of 2026 Kali Senthilkumar S/o.Thangavel Gounder ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented the Superintendent of Police, Tirupur District, At Tirupur. 2.The Inspector of Police, Dhally Police Station, Tirupur District. 3.Sivakumar, S/o.Thangavel Gounder ... Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to accord police protection to me and petitioner property comprised in Ka Sa No. 446/1, measuring 4.59 acres, Ka Sa No.445 measuring 2.27 acres, Ka Sa No.444 measuring 0.53 cents, Ka Sa No.458/3 measuring 95 cents, Ka Sa No.459 measuring 85 cents, Ka Sa No.460/1 measuring 45 cents totally admeasuring 9 acres 64 cents having patta no.436 and 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P. Crl. No.66 of 2026 403 at Jallipatti Village Udumalaipettai Taluk Tiruppur District based on my complaint dated 27.01.2025 and 04.12.2025. For Petitioner : Mr.Charles Kamalesh M.Appaji For Respondents : Mr.R.Ganesh Kumar for R1 and R2 Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side) High Court of Madras R3 – No Appearance O R D E R This writ petition has been filed for direction directing respondents 1 and 2 to accord police protection to the petitioner and his property comprised in Ka Sa No. 446/1, measuring 4.59 acres, Ka Sa No.445 measuring 2.27 acres, Ka Sa No.444 measuring 0.53 cents, Ka Sa No.458/3 measuring 95 cents, Ka Sa No.459 measuring 85 cents, Ka Sa No.460/1 measuring 45 cents totally admeasuring 9 acres 64 cents having patta no.436 and 403 at Jallipatti Village Udumalaipettai Taluk Tiruppur District based on the petitioner’s complaints dated 27.01.2025 and 04.12.2025. 2.There is civil dispute between the petitioner and the third respondent who are being brothers. Infact a suit for partition is pending between them in O.S.No.362 of 2018 on the file of the learned 3rd Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tiruppur. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P. Crl. No.66 of 2026 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the third respondent is obstructing the water flow through the coconut groove. 4.Hence, police protection cannot be granted to the property. The petitioner ought to have approached the same civil Court for appropriate relief. 5.This writ petition is dismissed. 13.07.2026 pri Index: Yes/ No Speaking Order: Yes/ No NCC: Yes/ No To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Tirupur District, At Tirupur. 2.The Inspector of Police, Dhally Police Station, Tirupur District. 3.The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Chennai – 600 104. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P. Crl. No.66 of 2026 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN,J. pri W.P. Crl. No.66 of 2026 13.07.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis