Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 53921 (KAR)

SHRI. BHARAMANNA GOPAL MUDAKAPPAGOL v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/105008/2025 · 2026-01-27

V Srishananda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:980 CRL.P No. 105008 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 105008 OF 2025 (482(CR.PC)/528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: SHRI. BHARAMANNA GOPAL MUDAKAPPAGOL AGE. 52 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. BASTWAD, TQ. AND DIST. BELAGAVI, PIN 590020. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SANTOSH B. MALAGOUDAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA THROUGH PSI HIREBAGEWADI POLICE STATION, BELAGAVI, REPTD BY ADDL. STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, SPP OFFICE, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH. 2. SRI NAGAPPA MADDEPPA SOGALAD AGE. 62 YEARS, OCC. ADVOCATE, R/O. BHARAT NAGAR, (P). SHAHAPUR, BELAGAVI, TAL. AND DIST. BELAGAVI, PIN 590003 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. KIRTILATA R. PATIL, HCGP FOR R1; NOTICE SERVED TO R2) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.P.C. (528 OF BNSS), PRAYING TO QUASH THE COMPLAINT AND FIR REGISTERED IN HIREBAGEWADI P S CRIME NO. 54/2011 REGISTERED FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE U/S 420, 465, 468 AND 471 OF IPC IN SO FAR AS PRESENT PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1 IS CONCERNED AND QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN CC NO.57/2020, REGISTERED FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE U/S 465, 463, 471 OF IPC, PENDING ON THE FILE OF V ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C. COURT Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH Date: 2026.01.29 11:03:32 +0530 - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:980 CRL.P No. 105008 of 2025 BELAGAVI, IN SO FAR AS PRESENT PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO 1 IS CONCERNED TO MEET TO ENDS OF JUSTICE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking withdrawal. The memo reads as under: MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL “That in the top noted petition, petitioner intends to withdraw the petition for the time being Reserving liberty to challenge the impugned proceedings in the later stage and the same may kindly be permitted to meet the ends of justice. Hence this Memo” 2. Placing the memo on record, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Sd/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE RHR/-Ct-cmu LIST NO.: 2 SL NO.: 88