Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5392 (JHR)

SURAJ SINGH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./11371/2025 · 2026-02-19

Rajesh Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:4929 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.11371 of 2025 Suraj Singh, Age- 26 years, S/o Shiv Kumar Singh, R/o Post-Khekhrua P.S. Khekhrua, Gram Khekhrua, Dist. Amethi, PIN-229126, Uttar Pradesh, UID No. 9128 8644 0551. …Petitioner(s)/Applicant(s) Versus The State of Jharkhand … …Opp. Party(s) --- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR --- For the Petitioner(s)/Applicant(s) : Mr. Prakash Jha, Adv. For the State : Mr. V.K. Vashistha, A.P.P. --- 03/19.02.2026: Heard the parties. 2. The applicant, who is in custody since 12.09.2025, has approached this Court for grant of regular bail in connection with Barkatha P.S. Case No.112/2025, registered for the offence U/s 20(B)(ii)(c), 22(c), 29 of N.D.P.S. Act, pending in the court of Principal District & Sessions Judge, Hazaribagh. 3. Innocence has been claimed and participation in the trial has been assured. On the above basis, prayer for bail has been made. 4. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail and it has been submitted that 39 Kg. and 500 gram of Ganja has been recovered from various hidden chamber of the vehicle and this applicant was driving the vehicle along with the owner. Thus, there is enough material, connecting this applicant with the crime. It is commercial quantity and mandate of Section 37 of the NDPS Act has to be followed. 5. In that view of the matter, I am not inclined to enlarge the applicant (s) on bail at this stage. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the applicant(s) stands rejected. (Rajesh Kumar, J.) February 19th, 2026 Ravi-Chandan/- Uploaded