G.B. SHIVAKUMAR v. M/S KAYAN EARTH MOVERS AND TRANSPORTERS
CRL.RP/100249/2021 · 2026-01-31
V Srishananda
Criminal Appealbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 53899 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 53899 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1299 CRL.RP No. 100249 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No.100249 OF 2021 (397(CR.PC)/438(BNSS)) BETWEEN:
G.B. SHIVAKUMAR AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, SON OF LATE G.A. BABANNA, RESIDING AT MANAIKANTA-NILAYA, 15TH WARD, BHARATI NAGAR, OLD AMARAVATI, HOSAPETE, DISTRICT VIJAYANAGARA-583201. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. D.J. SATHISHA, ADVOCATE) AND:
M/S KAYAN EARTH MOVERS AND TRANSPORTERS HAVING OFFICE AT 5TH WARD, NEAR BALANJINEYA TEMPLE, M.J. NAGAR, HOSAPETE-583201 R/BY ITS PARTNER, SRI. M. SHARAVANAN.
AGE: 60 YEARS, OCC. TRANSPORTER, …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. HARISH S. MAIGUR, ADGVOCATE)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C. 1973 PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 5041/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT BALLARI, SITTING AT HOSAPETE, AFFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 11.09.2018, PASSED IN C.C.NO.573/2011, BY THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS, HOSAPETE, U/S 138 OF N I ACT AND CONSEQUENTIALLY ACQUIT THE PETITIONER IN THE SAID CASE.
CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Date: 2026.02.02 17:04:30 +0530
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1299 CRL.RP No. 100249 of 2021
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA)
None appears for the petitioner. Even on the last date, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Petitioner has suffered an order of conviction for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
2. Matter, though admitted on 06.11.2023, there is no progress in the matter.
3. Taking note of the same, revision petition is dismissed for non prosecution.
4. The amount in deposit is ordered to be withdrawn by the complainant under due identification.
Sd/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE
kcm CT:CMU LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 35