2026:HHC:12879 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No. 4756 of 2026 Decided on : 22.04.2026 Sushil Kumar Verma …Petitioner Versus The State Bank of India and others …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Ms. Aafreen Kaushal, Advocate, vice Mr. Vishwa Bhushan, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Arvind Sharma, Advocate. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner prays that as there is some technical defect in the petition, petitioner be allowed to withdraw this petition, with liberty to file a fresh petition. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the petition otherwise is also not maintainable 3. Be that as it may, the petitioner is allowed to 1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2026:HHC:12879 withdraw this petition, with liberty, as prayed for. In the event of any fresh petition being filed, respondents can always raised the issue of maintainability. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge April 22, 2026 (Shivank Thakur)