SHRI CHANDRAKANTHS/O BOMMANATH BABANI v. CHANDRAHAS M BANDI
CCC/100399/2025 · 2026-02-13
B Muralidhara Pai, M I Arun
Contempt Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5388 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5388 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:2263-DB CCC No. 100399 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B. MURALIDHARA PAI CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.100399 OF 2025 (CIVIL) BETWEEN:
SHRI. CHANDRAKANTH, S/O. BOMMANATH BABANI, AGE: 59 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O: WARD NO.04, CTS NO.103, NAVANAGAR BAGALKOTE – 587 103, TQ & DIST: BAGALKOTE, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT R/O: SECTOR NO.28, NEAR LARA DRY CLEANERS, NAVANGAR, BAGALKOTE-587 103, TQ & DIST: BAGALKOTE.
… COMPLAINANT (BY SRI. PRUTHVI K. S., ADV.)
AND:
1.
CHANDRAHAS M. BANDI, AGE: 58 YEARS, OCC: THE CHIEF ENGINEER BAGALKOT TOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, BAGALKOTE – 587 103, TQ & DIST BAGALKOTE.
2.
NAVEEN PRASAD KATTIMANI, AGE: 40 YEARS, OCC: THE REHABILITATION OFFICER, BAGALKOT TOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BAGALKOTE–587 103, TQ & DIST BAGALKOTE.
… ACCUSED (BY SRI. SANJAY S. CHANAL, ADV. FOR A1 & A2)
THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, PRAYING TO AWARD PUNISHMENT FOR CONTEMPT OF COURT TO THE ACCUSED NO.1 AND 2 CONTEMNORS FOR WILLFUL DIS - OBEDIENCE AND BREACH OF DIRECTION/ORDER PASSED BY THIS HON’BLE COURT IN WRIT
Digitally signed by VISHAL NINGAPPA PATTIHAL Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, Dharwad
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:2263-DB CCC No. 100399 of 2025
PETITION NO.100231/2025 (GM-RES) DATED 22/8/2025 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND ETC.,
THIS CONTEMPT PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B. MURALIDHARA PAI
ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR.. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN)
The learned counsel for the complainant and the
learned counsel for the accused together submit that the
order under contempt has been complied with. For that reason, the contempt petition is hereby dismissed.
In view of dismissal of the petition, pending I.As., if any, are disposed of as not surviving for consideration.
Sd/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE
Sd/- (B. MURALIDHARA PAI) JUDGE
KMS / CT:ASC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6