Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010057522026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/899/2026 NILUFA BEGUM W/O- LT. IMRAN HUSSAIN KHANDAKAR, R/O- H NO. 19B, SARUMOTORIA, DISPUR P.S. DIPUR, DIST.- KAMRUP (M), ASSAM, PIN- 781005 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS THROUGH THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY, HOME DEPTT., GOVT. OF ASSAM, DISPUR, GUWAHATI, PIN- 781006 2:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE ASSAM ULUBARI GUWAHATI- 781008 3:THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL MAIDAM GAON BELTOLA GUWAHATI- 781021 4:COMMANDANT 22ND ASSAM POLICE (IR) BATTALION LIKABALI DHEMAJI 5:MST. CHAJIRAN BEGAM W/O- LATE HABIBAR RAHAMAN KHANDAKAR VILL- NAGAON P.S. BAIHATA CHARIALI KAMRUP ASSAM PIN- 781381 Page No.# 2/3 6:MUSLIM MARRIAGE AND DIVORCE REGISTRAR AND KAZI MAHTOLI (SONTOLI) P.O. MAHTOLI KAMRUP ASSAM- 781136 7:MUSSTT. SAIRA SULTANA W/O LATE IMRAN HUSSAIN KHANDAKAR RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO. 47 PURANABASTI FAKARUDDIN ALI AHMED PATH SIX MILE PS DISPUR GUWAHATI 22 DIST KAMRUP M ASSA For the Applicant(s) : Mr. A. Ganguly, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. R. Dhar, Addl. Sr. GA, Assam : Mr. A. S. Tapadar, Advocate : Ms. Tinglung, Standing Counsel BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH ORDER Date : 30.04.2026 This is an application filed by the Petitioner in the accompanying writ petition as applicant to implead the Opposite Party No.7 who was the first wife of the husband of the applicant as a party to the accompanying writ petition on the ground that the presence of the Opposite Party No.7 would be essential for effective adjudication of the dispute. 2. Mr. A. Ganguly, the learned counsel had further referred to Page No.# 3/3 the order passed by this Court on 19.02.2026 and submitted that in view of the said order, the accompanying writ proceedings cannot proceed without the Opposite Party No.7 being arrayed as a party to the accompanying writ petition. 3. Taking into account the order dated 19.02.2026 as well as the dispute involved in the instant proceedings, it is the opinion of this Court that the presence of the Opposite Party No.7 to the dispute in hand is necessary for an effective adjudication. 4. Accordingly, the Opposite Party No.7 is arrayed as the Respondent No.7 to the accompanying writ petition. 5. The learned counsel for the Petitioner is directed to file a fresh Memo of Parties before the Registry of this Court within 7 (seven) days and the Registry shall on the basis of the present order as well as the Memo of Parties, make necessary correction to the Cause Title of the accompanying writ proceedings as well as update the same in the CIS. 6. I.A. stands allowed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant