YUNUS S/O MASTANSAB SHEKH v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
CRL.A/100718/2025 · 2026-02-02
V Srishananda
Criminal Appealbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 53875 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 53875 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1362 CRL.A No. 100718 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 100718 OF 2025 (U/S 14 A(2) OF SC AND ST ACT) BETWEEN:
1. YUNUS S/O MASTANSAB SHEKH AGE. 39 YEARS, OCC. COOLIE,
2. HAJESAB S/O MASTANSAB SHEKH AGE. 30 YEARS, OCC. COOLIE,
3. MAKBUL S/O MASTANSAB SHEKH AGE. 38 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE,
4. MASTANSAB S/O HAJISAB SHEKH AGE. 62 YEARS, OCC. COOLIE, ALL ARE R/O MUDHOL 587313, TQ. MUDHOL, DIST. BAGALKOTE. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. N.L. BATAKURKI, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY PSI BAGALKOT MUDHOL P.S. 587313 TQ. MUDHOL, DIST. BAGALKOTE, REP. BY SPP AG OFFICE HIGH COURT BUILDING DHARWAD. 2. PANDAPPA S/O GANGAPPA LAMANI AGE. 58 YEARS, OCC. COOLIE,
3. KASTURI NAGARAJ LAMANI, AGE. 45 YEARS, OCC. COOLIE,
CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Date: 2026.02.03 12:39:14 +0530
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1362 CRL.A No. 100718 of 2025
4. GANGA MANJUNATH LAMANI AGE. 29 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE,
5. SHANTAWWA PANDAPPA LAMANI AGE. 49 YEARS, OCC. COOLIE, ALL ARE R/O JAYNAGAR MUDHOL 587313, TQ. MUDHOL, DIST. BAGALKOTE. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. JAIRAM SIDDI, HCGP FOR R1;
NOTICE SERVED R2 TO R5)
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 14A(2) OF SC/ST (POA) ACT, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE IV ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGES SPECIAL JUDGE BAGALKOT IN CRIL MISC NO.496/2025 DATED 07.11.2025 FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCES U/SEC. 189(2), 191(2), 191(3), 329(3), 115(2), 127(2), 324(4), 74, 76, 49, 352, 351(3), R/W 190 OF. B. N. S ACT. AND U/SEC 3(1) (R), 3(1)(s), 3 (1) (w), 3(2)(va) OF SC AND ST (PREVENTION OF ATROCITIES). ACT 2015 AND ORDER TO ENLARGE THE APPELLANTS/ ACCUSED NO. 1 TO 3 AND 5 ON ANTICIPATORY BAIL IN THE EVENT OF THEIR ARREST IN MUDHOL. P. S. CR.NO. 304/2025 FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCES THE U/SEC. 189(2), 191(2), 191(3), 329(3), 115(2), 127(2), 324(4), 74, 76, 49, 352, 351(3), R/W 190 OF. B. N. S ACT. AND U/SEC 3(1)(R), 3(1)(S), 3 (1) (W), 3(2)(VA) OF SCAND ST (PREVENTION OF ATROCITIES) ACT 2015 ON THE FILE OF IV ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE BAGALKOT BY ALLOWING THIS APPEAL.
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1362 CRL.A No. 100718 of 2025
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA)
After addressing the arguments for some time, Sri. N. L. Batakurki, learned counsel for the appellants has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the appeal. The memo reads as under:
"Herein the Advocate for appellants submits as under: The appellants may be permitted that to withdraw above appeal with liberty to approach trial Court once again after filing charge sheet in the interest of justice. Hence, the memo. ”
Placing the memo on record, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Sd/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE
SMM, CT:CMU LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 4