M/s.KM Spintex (Covai) Pvt Ltd., v. The Assistant Commissioner (ST) (FAC)
WP/26559/2026 · 2026-07-22
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 53867 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 53867 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
WP No. 26559 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 22-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY WP No. 26559 of 2026 and W.M.P.No.29056 of 2026 M/s.KM Spintex (Covai) Pvt Ltd., Represented by its Directior Gopalakrishnan.S, 213, Bharathiyar Road, New Siddhapudur,Coimbatore -641 018. ..Petitioner(s) Vs The Assistant Commissioner (ST) (FAC) P.N.Palayam Assessment Circle, Coimbatore, 161, commercial taxes building, meenakshi, sundaranar road - 638001. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the impugned Order reference No. 33AACCK6463E1ZQ, along with its summary in Form DRC 07 bearing reference no. ZD331225260033Y dated 16.12.2025 passed by the Respondent and quash the same being arbitrary, passed in violation of the principles of natural justice, and thus render justice. For Petitioner(s): Mr.N.Sri Prithvi Reddy For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Sethu Prabakaran, Government Counsel (Tax) *********** https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 26559 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 ORDER An order dated 16.12.2025 is assailed on the ground that the petitioner did not have a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits. 2. Mr.R.Sethu Prabakaran, learned Government Counsel (Tax), accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. 3. On perusal of the impugned order, it is evident that such order was issued without hearing the petitioner. The writ petition has been filed after the period of limitation expired. 4. On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner agrees to remit 25% of the disputed tax demand as a condition for remand. An endorsement to that effect has been made on the bundle. 5. Subject to the condition that the petitioner remits 25% of the disputed tax demand within thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded for re-consideration. After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, a fresh order shall be issued within three months from the date of remittance of 25% of the disputed tax demand. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 26559 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4
6. The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, connected writ miscellaneous petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
22-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No RNA To The Assistant Commissioner (ST) (FAC) P.N.Palayam Assessment Circle, Coimbatore, 161, commercial taxes building, meenakshi, sundaranar road - 638001. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 26559 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. RNA WP No. 26559 of 2026 and W.M.P.No.29056 of 2026 22-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis