VEENA DEVI Versus AMAR NATH AND ANOTHER CRMPM-646 of 2026 22.04.2026 Present: Ms. Sheetal Vyas, Advocate, for the petitioner. CRMPM-646 of 2026 By way of instant application filed under Section 5 of Limitation Act, prayer has been made on behalf of the applicant/ appellant for condonation of delay in maintaining the accompanying appeal, which is barred by limitation. Having carefully perused the averments contained in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit, this Court finds no impediment in accepting the prayer, especially when delay caused in maintaining accompanying appeal does not appear to be intentional or willful, rather same has occurred on account of circumstances, which were completely beyond the control of the applicant, as such, the same deserves to be condoned. In view of above, delay, which has been otherwise sufficiently explained is condoned. The application is disposed of. Cr.Appeal No. of 2026 (Cr.A.(A-SB) - 2370 of 2026) Be registered. Admit. Notice. Mr. Ravi Chauhan, learned Deputy Advocate General, appears and accepts service of notice on behalf of respondents No.2-State. Separate notice to respondents No.1 be issued, returnable within six weeks, on taking steps within two weeks. In the meanwhile, record of learned Court below be called for. April 22, 2026 (Sandeep Sharma), (sunil) Judge