Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRL OP No. 19058 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 20-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL OP No. 19058 of 2026 Sasikumar S/o. Venkatesan, No.23-8 Ward,Kannanur Mariyamman Kovil Street, Omalur Post, Salem-636455. ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State, Inspector of Police Omalur Police Station, Salem District. Crime No.217 of 2026 ..Respondent(s) PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in Crime NO.217 of 2026 pending investigation on the file of the respondent police and thus render justice. For Petitioner(s): Mr.T. Dhasarathan For Respondent(s): MS.R.S.Indira, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ORDER The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offence punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 296(b), 127(2) and 109(1) of BNS, in Crime No.217 of 2026, on the file of the respondent Police, seeks anticipatory bail. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 19058 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4
2. The case of the prosecution is that there was previous enmity between the petitioner and the accused, that on 28.04.2026, while the defacto complainant was watching IPL cricket match, the petitioner along with the other accused, abused the defacto complainant in filthy language and criminally intimidated him and attempted to strike with aruval. Hence, the case. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that this is the second anticipatory bail petition. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and, upon instructions, submitted that the petitioner has seven previous cases against him, and if the petitioner is enlarged on bail it would send a wrong information to the society. Hence, he opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5. I have given my anxious consideration to either side submissions. 6. While looking at the facts of the case, an earlier anticipatory bail petition was dismissed on 04.06.2026, and even with the present application, https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 19058 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 this Court could not find any change in circumstances. Further, this Court is of the firm view that it is not a desirable case to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail.
Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 20-07-2026 DRL To 1.The Inspector of Police Omalur Police Station, Salem District. 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 19058 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. DRL CRL OP No. 19058 of 2026 20-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis