Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 53855 (KAR)

SUNIL S/O DODDAHANAMAPPA KARLAWAD v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/104605/2025 · 2026-02-02

V Srishananda

Criminal Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1365 CRL.A No. 100725 of 2025 C/W CRL.P No. 104605 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 100725 OF 2025 (U/S 14 A(2) OF SC AND ST ACT) C/W CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 104605 OF 2025 IN CRL.A.NO.100725/2025: BETWEEN: RIYAZ S/O HUSENSAB KARNACHI AGE. 26 YEARS, OCC. PRIVATE WORK, R/O. KURTAKOTI VILLAGE, TQ.DIST. GADAG-582205. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. PRAVEEN HUCHARADDI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA, ANNIGERI POLICE STATION, DHARWAD, REPRESENTED BY LEARNED, STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD-580011. 2. SHARANAPPA S/O BHIMAPPA MALIGAWAD AGE. 26 YEARS, OCC. FARMER, R/O. SHISHUVANAHALLI, TQ. NAVALGUND, DIST. DHARWAD-581209. 3. SUVARNA W/O BHIMAPPA MALLIGWAD AGE. 52 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, R/O. SHISHUVANAHALLI. TQ. NAVALAGUND, DIST. DHARWAD. 581209. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. PRAVEEN HUCHARADDI, ADVOCATE) THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 14A(2) OF SC/ST (POA) ACT, 1989 PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 14/11/2025 PASSED IN SPL. SCST NO.40/2025 ON THE FILE OF THE CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Date: 2026.02.03 12:39:14 +0530 - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1365 CRL.A No. 100725 of 2025 C/W CRL.P No. 104605 of 2025 II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE DHARWAD AND SPECIAL COURT FOR TRIAL OF THE OFFENCES UNDER THE P.O.C.S.O. ACT AND S.C. AND S.T. (P.O.A) ACT FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCES PUNISHABLE U/S 103(1) OF B.N.S. AND U/S 3(1)(r)(s), 3(2)(v) OF THE SC AND THE ST (PREVENTION OF ATROCITIES) ACT, 1989 ARISING OUT OF THE ANNIGERI PS CRIME NO. 66/2025 AND ENLARGE THE APPELLANT ON REGULAR BAIL IN SPL. SCST NO.40/2025. IN CRL.P.NO.104605/2025: BETWEEN: SUNIL S/O DODDAHANAMAPPA KARLAWAD AGE 23 YEARS, OCC. COOLIE WORK R/O. SHISHIVINAHALLI, TQ. ANNIGERI DIST DHARWAD 582201. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. ANILKUMAR H. BUDARPUR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, R/BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SPP OFFICE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH 580011 THROUGH ANNIGERI POLICE STATION, DHARWAD. 2. SUVARNA S/O BHIMAPPA MALLIGWAD AGE. 42 YEARS, OCC. FARMER, R/O. AT SHIVANAHALLI VILLAGE, TQ. ANNIGERI, DIST. DHARWAD- 581209. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. JAIRAM SIDDI, HCGP FOR R1; SRI. SADIQ GOODWALA, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 483 OF BNSS, 2023 PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.2 ON REGULAR BAIL IN SPL.SC.ST.NO. 40/2025 ARISING OUT OF ANNIGERI P.S. CRIME NO. 66/2025 DATED 02.07.2025 FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/SEC. 103(1) OF BNS, 2023. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1365 CRL.A No. 100725 of 2025 C/W CRL.P No. 104605 of 2025 THE CRIMINAL APPEAL AND THE CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA) After addressing the arguments for some time, Sri. Praveen Hucharaddi, learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the appeal. Sri. Anilkumar H. Budrapur, learned counsel for the petitioner has also filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition. The memo filed in Criminal Appeal No.100725/2025 reads as under: "Herein, the advocate for the appellant begs to submits as under: That, the top noted case the RFSL Report is not yet received by the trial Court. Hence, the petitioner is intending to withdrawn the above appeal with liberty to file fresh appeal after getting reports. Wherefore, the appeal may please be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty, to file fresh appeal, in the interest of justice.” The memo filed in Criminal Petition No.104605/2025 reads as under: - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1365 CRL.A No. 100725 of 2025 C/W CRL.P No. 104605 of 2025 "Herein, the petitioner begs to submits as under: That in the above case, the petitioner has filed Criminal Petition and in the above case the provisions of the SC and ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act is also invoked. Thus, the petition suffers from technical defects. Hence, the Hon’ble Court be please to permit the petitioner to withdraw the above case with liberty to file fresh on grounds in the interest of justice.” Placing the memos on record, the following: ORDER (i) The appeal in Criminal Appeal No.100725/2025 is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. (ii) The petition in Criminal Petition No.104605/2025 is dismissed as not maintainable. Sd/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE SMM, CT:CMU LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 5