Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 53838 (KAR)

SMT. SAVITA W/O PANDURANG BHUTHBILLA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WA/100270/2021 · 2026-01-21

B Muralidhara Pai, M I Arun

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:700-DB WA No. 100270 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B. MURALIDHARA PAI WRIT APPEAL NO. 100270 OF 2021 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SMT. SAVITA W/O PANDURANG BHUTHBILLA, AGE: 25 YEARS, OCC: ANGANAVADI WORKER, R/O.: 75/3 WARD NO. 3, YARAGERA, TQ. AND DIST.: KOPPAL, PIN - 583281. … APPELLANT (BY SRI. HEMANTHKUMAR L.HAVARAGI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF WOMEN AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT, PIN-560001. 2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, KOPPAL DISTRICT, KOPPAL, PIN – 583231. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR, WOMEN AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT WELFARE DEPARTMENT, KOPPAL, DIST.: KOPPAL, PIN - 583231. 4. THE SECRETARY, CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER, ANGNAVADI WORKERS SELECTION COMMITTEE, KUSTAGI, TQ.: KUSTAGI, DIST.: KOPPAL, PIN - 583231. 5. HOLIYAMMA D/O. HANAMANTHAPA UPPER AGE: 26 YEARS, OCC: NIL, Digitally signed by VISHAL NINGAPPA PATTIHAL Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, Dharwad - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:700-DB WA No. 100270 of 2021 R/O.: YEREGERA VILLAGE, TQ.: KUSTAGI, DIST.: KOPPAL, PIN - 583231. … RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHARAD V. MAGADUM, AGA FOR R1 TO R4; SRI. H. M. DHARIGOND, ADV. FOR R5) THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, 1961, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 22/10/2021 PASSED IN W.P. NO. 148745/2020 BY THE SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS HON’BLE HIGH COURT AND THEREBY ALLOW THE WRIT APPEAL, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE. THIS WRIT APPEAL, COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B. MURALIDHARA PAI JUDGMENT (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN) None appears for the appellant. It is noticed that the learned counsel for the appellant has been continuously absent. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. For these reasons, the appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE Sd/- (B. MURALIDHARA PAI) JUDGE VNP / CT: CNB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 43