Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5382 (AP)

M/S. SRI SATYANARAYANA OIL & RICE MILL. v. THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, GUDIVASA, & ANOTHER

WP/8378/2007 · 2026-07-12

Ninala Jayasurya, T C D Sekhar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010030682007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH MONDAY, THE 13 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION N Between: 1. M/S. SRI SATYANARAYANA OIL & RICE MILL, AGRIPALLI MANDAL KRISHNA DISTRICT RAO, AGED 65 YEARS. 1. THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER 2. THE SPECIAL ASSISTANT COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER (INTELLIGENCE), SAMARANGAM CHOWK, VIJAYWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. Mr.GUDURI VENKATESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAX 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE 13th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION No: 8378 of 2007 M/S. SRI SATYANARAYANA OIL & RICE MILL, AGRIPALLI MANDAL KRISHNA DISTRICT, REP.BY PROPRIETOR SRI MRNL NARAYANA AGED 65 YEARS. ...PETITIONER AND THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, GUDIVADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. THE SPECIAL ASSISTANT COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER , SAMARANGAM CHOWK, VIJAYWADA, KRISHNA ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: GUDURI VENKATESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAX IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3543] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR M/S. SRI SATYANARAYANA OIL & RICE MILL, AGRIPALLI MANDAL, BY PROPRIETOR SRI MRNL NARAYANA ...PETITIONER KRISHNA DISTRICT. THE SPECIAL ASSISTANT COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER , SAMARANGAM CHOWK, VIJAYWADA, KRISHNA ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 The Court made the following order: It is submitted that despite best efforts of the learned counsel for the petitioner, he is not able to get appropriate instructions from the legal representatives of the sole proprietor / petitioner. In view of the same, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Consequently, all pending applications, if any, shall stand dismissed. ___________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA _____________________ JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR Dt.13.07.2026 BLV 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA & THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR W.P.No.8378 of 2007 Dt: 13.07.2026