Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5381 (RAJ)

DINESH @ LARA S/O OMPRAKASH v. STATE OF RAJSTHAN

CRLMB/5028/2026 · 2026-04-15

Sangeeta Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:15594] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5028/2026 Dinesh @ Lara S/o Omprakash, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Ward No. 02, Acharyo Ka Mohalla, Fatehpur, P.S. Kotwali Fatehpur, District Sikar (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Fatehpur). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajsthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Devanshu Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 15/04/2026 1. This bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused- petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 73/2026 registered at Police Station Fatehpur Kotwali, District Sikar for the offence(s) under Section 4/25 of Arms Act. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case; recovery has already been effected. He further submits that petitioner is behind the bars since 11.03.2026; conclusion of trial may take a long time, the alleged offence is triable by Magistrate, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. [2026:RJ-JP:15594] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-5028/2026] 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application and submits that there are five other criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner. 4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the fact that recovery has already been effected; petitioner is behind the bars since 11.03.2026; the alleged offence is triable by Magistrate; trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 5. Therefore, this bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Dinesh @ Lara S/o Omprakash is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence on 1st and 15th day of every month in the concerned police station. 7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. [2026:RJ-JP:15594] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-5028/2026] 8. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. 9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J SHIVANI/40