- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1317 RSA No. 100904 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 100904 OF 2025 (SP) BETWEEN: S. RAMANNA S/O. LATE S. SIDDAPPA, SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS. 1. SMT. K. TAYAMMA W/O. LATE S. RAMANNA, AGE: 63 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. WARD NO.05, GUGGARAHATTI, BANGALORE ROAD, DIST. BALLARI-583101. 2. SMT. K. LAKSHMI W/O. A. RAMESH D/O. S. RAMANNA, AGE: 45 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE, R/O. WARD NO.05, GUGGARAHATTI, BANGALORE ROAD, DIST. BALLARI-583101. 3. K. BHARATI W/O. K. BASAVARAJ, D/O. LATE S. RAMANNA, AGE: 43 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE, R/O. WARD NO.05, GUGGARAHATTI, BANGALORE ROAD, DIST. BALLARI-583101. 4. K. MANJULA W/O. HANUMANTHAREDDY K., D/O. LATE S. RAMANNA, AGE: 41 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE, R/O. WARD NO.05, GUGGARAHATTI, BANGALORE ROAD, DIST. BALLARI-583101. 5. MANJUNATH GOUDA R. S/O. LATE S. RAMANNA, AGE: 40 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. WARD NO.05, GUGGARAHATTI, Digitally signed by MALLIKARJUN RUDRAYYA KALMATH Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1317 RSA No. 100904 of 2025 BANGALORE ROAD, DIST. BALLARI-583101. 6. K. NETRAVATHI W/O. SRINIVAS D/O. LATE S. RAMANNA, AGE: 38 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE, R/O. WARD NO.05, GUGGARAHATTI, BANGALORE ROAD, DIST. BALLARI-583101. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI H. N. GULARADDI AND SMT. KAVYA SHIVAPPA YALAGI, ADVOCATES) AND: TEEKAPPA S/O. LATE ERANNA, SINCE DECEASED BY HER LRS. 1. E. GANESH S/O. LATE E. TEEKAPPA, AGE: 56 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. BANDIHATTI, COWL BAZAR, DIST. BALLARI-583236. 2. E. RAGHAVENDRA S/O. LATE E. TEEKAPPA, AGE: 54 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. BANDIHATTI, COWL BAZAR, DIST. BALLARI-583236. 3. T. D. THIMMAPPA S/O. LATE E. TEEKAPPA, AGE: 52 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. BANDIHATTI, COWL BAZAR, DIST. BALLARI-583236. 4. KUNTI LAKSHMI D/O. E. TEEKAPPA, AGE 50 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE, R/O. BANDIHATTI, COWL BAZAR, DIST. BALLARI-583236. 5. SMT. LAKSHMI, 2ND WIFE OF E. TEEKAPPA, AGE: 55 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE, R/O. BANDIHATTI, COWL BAZAR, DIST. BALLARI-583236. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1317 RSA No. 100904 of 2025 6. VEERESHA S/O. LATE E. TEEKAPPA, AGE: 22 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. BANDIHATTI, COWL BAZAR, DIST. BALLARI-583236. 7. GURU S/O. E. TEEKAPPA, AGE: 20 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT, R/O. BANDIHATTI, COWL BAZAR, DIST. BALLARI-583236. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI M. H. PATIL AND SRI. H. M. PATIL, ADV. FOR R1 & R2) THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS, PERUSE THE SAME AND SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 01.09.2025 PASSED IN R.A. NO.44/2017 PASSED BY THE II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, AT BALLARI CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 26.08.2017 PASSED BY THE PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM AT BALLARI IN O.S.NO.244/2011, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1317 RSA No. 100904 of 2025 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR) Case is called. The appellants and respondents and their respective counsels were present on 31.01.2026. The counsels for both parties have filed duly signed compromise petition under Order XXIII Rule 3 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. 2. Under the compromise, it is stated that the suit is filed by the plaintiff for the relief of specific performance. On the advice made by the elders and well wishers both appellants and respondents compromised the case and filed this petition. 3. Both appellants and respondents have compromised amicably settled the matter and accordingly compromised the case. 4. According to the compromise petition both parties prayed to draw decree as per compromise petition. 5. The contents of the compromise petition explained to the parties to the suit in the language known to them. They admit its contents and they have stated that, they have - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1317 RSA No. 100904 of 2025 subscribed their signatures on the compromise petition after understanding its contents. 6. The compromise entered into by the parties is legal and appears to be voluntary. Hence, it is accepted. Thus, the suit is decreed in terms of compromise petition. 7. Office is hereby directed to draw decree. The compromise petition shall be treated as part and parcel of the compromise decree. Sd/- (HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR) JUDGE PMP /CT-AN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 100