S RAMANNA S/O LATE S SIDDAPPA SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS v. E GANESH S/O LATE E TEEKAPPA
RSA/100941/2025 · 2026-01-30
Hanchate Sanjeevkumar
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 53786 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 53786 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1276 RSA No. 100941 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.100941 OF 2025 (POS) BETWEEN:
S. RAMANNA S/O. LATE S. SIDDAPPA, SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS.
1.
SMT. K. TAYAMMA W/O. LATE S. RAMANNA, AGE: 63 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. WARD NO.05, GUGGARAHATTI, BANGALORE ROAD, DIST. BALLARI-583101.
2.
SMT. K. LAKSHMI W/O. A. RAMESH D/O. S. RAMANNA, AGE: 45 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE, R/O. WARD NO.05, GUGGARAHATTI, BANGALORE ROAD, DIST. BALLARI-583101.
3.
K. BHARATI W/O. K. BASAVARAJ, D/O. LATE S. RAMANNA, AGE: 43 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE, R/O. WARD NO.05, GUGGARAHATTI, BANGALORE ROAD, DIST. BALLARI-583101.
4.
K. MANJULA W/O. HANUMANTHA REDDY K., D/O. LATE S. RAMANNA, AGE: 41 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE, R/O. WARD NO.05, GUGGARAHATTI, BANGALORE ROAD, DIST. BALLARI-583101.
5.
MANJUNATH GOUDA R.
S/O. LATE S. RAMANNA, AGE: 40 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. WARD NO.05, GUGGARAHATTI, BANGALORE ROAD, DIST. BALLARI-583101.
Digitally signed by MALLIKARJUN RUDRAYYA KALMATH Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1276 RSA No. 100941 of 2025
6.
K. NETRAVATHI W/O. SRINIVAS, D/O. LATE S. RAMANNA, AGE: 38 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE, R/O. WARD NO.05, GUGGARAHATTI, BANGALORE ROAD, DIST. BALLARI-583101. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI H. N. GULARADDI AND SRI SMT. KAVYA S. YALAGI, ADVOCATES)
AND:
1.
E. GANESH S/O. LATE TEEKAPPA, AGE: 56 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. BANDIHATTI, COWL BAZAR, DIST. BALLARI-583236.
2.
E. RAGHAVENDRA S/O. LATE TEEKAPPA, AGE: 54 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. BANDIHATTI, COWL BAZAR, DIST. BALLARI-583236.
3.
T. D. THIMMAPPA S/O. LATE TEEKAPPA, AGE: 52 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. BANDIHATTI, COWL BAZAR, DIST. BALLARI-583236. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI M. H. PATIL AND SRI H. M. PATIL, ADV. FOR R1)
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908, PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS, PERUSE THE SAME AND SET ASIDE THE
JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 01.09.2025 PASSED IN R.A.NO 43/2017 PASSED BY THE II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, AT BALLARI CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 26.08.2017 PASSED BY THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM AT BALLARI IN O.S.NO 10/2010 IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1276 RSA No. 100941 of 2025
ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR)
Case called out.
2. The appellants and respondents and their respective counsels are present. The counsels for both parties have filed duly signed Compromise Petition under
order XXIII rule 3 of C.P.C.
3. Under the compromise, it is stated that this suit is filed by the plaintiffs against the defendant for the relief of possession and permanent Injunction. On the advise made by the elders and well wishers both plaintiffs and defendant compromised the case and filed this compromise petition.
4. Both plaintiffs and defendant have compromised amicable settled the matter and accordingly compromised the case.
5. According to the compromise petition both parties prayed to draw decree as per compromise petition.
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1276 RSA No. 100941 of 2025
6. The contents of the compromise petition explained to the parties to the suit in the language known to them. They admit its contents and they have stated that, they have subscribed their signatures on the compromise petition after understanding its contents.
7. The compromise entered into the parties is legal and appears to voluntary. Hence, accepted. Thus, suit is
decreed in terms of compromise petition.
8. Office is hereby
directed to draw decree accordingly. The compromise petition shall be treated as part and parcel of the compromise decree. In view of the dismissal of appeal, pending I.A.’s, if any, shall also stand disposed of.
Sd/- (HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR) JUDGE
ASN /CT-AN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 63